10:09 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > > <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > > > > <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > >
> > > > > On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > >> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > >> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > > > > >> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > > >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >>>> From: "Itamar Heim"
<iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > >>>> To: "David Caro"
<dcaroest(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > >>>> Cc: "engine-devel"
<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
> > > > > >>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM
> > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar
Heim wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches.
> > > > > >>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which
were not touched over 60
> > > > > >>>>>> days
> > > > > >>>>>> (to
> > > > > >>>>>> begin with, I think the number should
actually be lower).
> > > > > >>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any
interested party post
> > > > > >>>>>> their
> > > > > >>>>>> closure.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list
should actually get
> > > > > >>>>>> attention,
> > > > > >>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with
a "lot of old
> > > > > >>>>>> patches"
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> thoughts?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>>> Itamar
> > > > > >>>>>>
_______________________________________________
> > > > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list
> > > > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > > >>>>>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script
that checks the
> > > > > >>>>> age
> > > > > >>>>> of
> > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > >>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the
reviewers and the
> > > > > >>>>> maintainer,
> > > > > >>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a
certain period just
> > > > > >>>>> abandons
> > > > > >>>>> it.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner
(or all
> > > > > >>>> subscribed
> > > > > >>>> to
> > > > > >>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14
days or
> > > > > >>>> something
> > > > > >>>> like
> > > > > >>>> that.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> This will be annoying.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> And there are patches that pending with good
reason.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no
comment, no
> > > > > >> rebase,
> > > > > >> nothing)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:maste...
> > > > >
> > > > > so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any
> > > > > comment
> > > > > from any reviewer.
> > > > > lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather
than
> > > > > let
> > > > > them get old and stay forever
> > > >
> > > > Again... maintainer can close these if he likes.
> > > > Owner can close these if he likes.
> > >
> > > right, but why?
> > > a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone
> > > into
> > > motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc).
> > > I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
> > >
> >
> > I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with
> > its
> > contributers.
>
> I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're
> saying.
> Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could
> actually spur those interactions into motion.
You prefer machines to interact with contributers to kick them in motion.
I believe that human interaction and discussion between maintainer and
contributer is the way to go.
It is much more polite and cooperative for maintainer that is not aware of
anything blocking a progress to kindly interact with contributer and finally
close the change if contributer is unresponsive and/or change has no value.
Personally I see nothing impolite about automatically abandoning patches if it is clear to
contributors that this the expected behaviour.
Other projects abandon automatically after a week and from what I've seen that is
working well to get things in motion and get those interactions that you (and I) want,
rolling.
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that maintainers avoid closing.
> > > > And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone
and
> > > > gone.
> > > >
> > > > So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
> > > >
> > > > 1. If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within
short
> > > > cycle
> > > > (can be even a week).
> > > > 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest
nor
> > > > > >>> progress.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Alon
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > vdsm-devel mailing list
> > > > vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> > > >
> > >
> >
>