... and let's not call this CPU overcommit feature. It's nothing like that -
it's "Hyperthread handling"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Grinberg" <simon(a)redhat.com>
To: "Greg Padgett" <gpadgett(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 1:13:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] CPU Overcommit Feature
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Padgett" <gpadgett(a)redhat.com>
> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 4:37:57 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] CPU Overcommit Feature
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on a feature to allow CPU Overcommitment of hosts
> in a
> cluster. This first stage allows the engine to consider host cpu
> threads
> as cores for the purposes of VM resource allocation.
>
> This wiki page has further details, your comments are welcome!
>
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/cpu_overcommit
Basically looking good.
Hyperthread though is vendor specific.
For AMD it's Clustered Multi-Thread while for Intel it's Hyper-Thread
Official name is simultaneous multithreading (SMT) but no one
outside of the academy will recognize that.
in libvirt if I read it right it's <attribute name='thread_siblings'>
So why not just call it threads.
We'll have cpuSockets, cpiCores, and cpuThreads, should be clear when
in CPU context.
In the GUI just change hyperthreads to CPU threads. While in the tool
tip explain that it's either AMD Clustered Multi-Thread or Intel
Hyperthread
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel