From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:37:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
----- Original Message -----
> On 02/14/2012 10:03 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 02/14/2012 09:20 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> >> On 02/14/2012 08:59 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >>> On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> >>>> On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >>>>> On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
> >>>>>>
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
> >>>>>
> >>>>> why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> preferred behavior?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I think that by default Laszlo meant in the upgrade process to
> >>>> maintain
> >>>> current behavior.
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree that for new entities the default should be true.
> >>>
> >>> i think the only combination which will allow this is for db to
> >>> default
> >>> to false and code to default to true for this property?
> >> Why can't we during upgrade process set to all existing entities
> >> in DB
> >> the value to false, but still have the column defined as
> >> "default
> >> true"?
> >
> > because upgrade and clean install are running the same scripts?
> I guess I still fail to understand.
> Scenarios (as both upgrade and clean install run the same scripts)
> a. In environment to be upgraded we have X entities that are non
> recoverable - after upgrade these X entities have the boolean flag
> set
> to false. New entities in the system will be created with auto
> recoverable set to true.
> b. In environment to be clean installed -we have 0 existing
> entities
> -
> after clean install all new entities in the system will be create
> with
> auto recoverable set to true.
> Will this be considered a bad behavior?
>
Why is there a field in the db for this?
Why is there absolutely no description in the wiki what this feature
*actually* does?
Why is there a periodic process to do this? iiuc
host/storage/whatever goes into non-operational mode due to
monitoring of this object and after a certain amount of time (or
immediately) where the object was reported to be in an error state
it is moved to non-operational.
Monitoring of these objects should just *not* stop and the second it
is reported ok, move the object back to up/active/whatever state.
What am I missing?
Let me see if I got it right: it means I've one process that
will go over all the "down" objects every X seconds, and will
issue "activate" action per object? this will be done sequentially I guess...
I would reduce the audit log time to 1 hour.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel