----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron@redhat.com> To: "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow@redhat.com> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org>, "Shu Ming" <shuming@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 6:44:14 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] restapi: Storage-Domain creation - Used Luns
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shu Ming" <shuming@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: "Ori Liel" <oliel@redhat.com> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 10:50:47 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] restapi: Storage-Domain creation - Used Luns
SHARED_LUN?
We won't be sharing them, we'll be overwriting them.
Maybe something like overwrite or force ?
I'm fine with either one (force / overwrite) or forceDelete as well or forceOverride.
yep, the key thing here is that we need to scare the user so it's very clear that this could be destructive.
On 2012-7-1 16:50, Ori Liel wrote:
We need to enable passing 'used' luns for new storage-domain creation (used = the lun is part of a VG). We need a way in rest-api to explicitly approve the use of such luns.
Does anyone have a suggestion for a good name for such a flag, a name that conveys: "use the given luns even if they are part of a VG?"
Thanks,
Ori. _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
-- Shu Ming <shuming@linux.vnet.ibm.com> IBM China Systems and Technology Laboratory
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel