Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yaniv Kaul"<ykaul(a)redhat.com> > To: "Roy Golan"<rgolan(a)redhat.com> > Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org > Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 5:10:16 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks > > On 02/06/2012 04:47 PM, Roy Golan wrote: >> Hi All >> >> Lately I've been working on a design of bridge-less network feature >> in the engine. >> You can see it in >> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Design/Network/Bridgeless_Networks#Bri... >> >> Please review the design. >> Note, there are some open issues, you can find in the relevant >> section. >> Reviews and comments are very welcome. >> >> Thanks, >> Roy >> _______________________________________________ >> Engine-devel mailing list >> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > 0. Fixed some typos in the wiki. There are others I couldn't > understand. > 1. "Also looking forward a capable of running VMs nics should be > bridged > on regular nics and un-bridged in case of dedicated special nics" - > don't understand what it means (English-wise too). correct, the phrasing is bad. I meant that when we are doing the actual attach, should we implicitly choose not to create a bridge on vNic or SRIOV ? Anyway for now the best and fastest approach I think is to give freedom of choice - the user will choose if the network should be bridged or not during the attach. > 2. "UI shall user shall" . > 3. Not sure the REST API is complete. How is the property set on the > logical network (upon creation or later) ? please see my former post. I suggest we won't have this property on the logical network at all. > 4. So, if there's no bridge on my bond, can I now use the bond > methods > that are incompatible with bridges and therefore we did not allow > them > until now? why not? is VDSM blocking those?

> Y. > > >