Re: [ovirt-devel] Packaging: Rationale for some split packages
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't know what are
the
reasons for having separate `infra', `xmlrpc', `yajsonrpc', and
`jsonrpc' packages.
- infra package contains infra related modules like zombiereaper,
sygutils (core infra utils)
- xmlrpc package contains xmlrpc binding code (optional and can be
disabled in config.py)
this package will be removed once we decide to drop xmlrpc
- jsonrpc package contains jsonrpc binding code (optional and can be
disabled in config.py)
this package is required to process jsonrpc based rpc calls
- yajsonrpc package contains stomp related server side code (required for rpc)
- api package contains vdsm and gluster (optionally) schemas and code
to process them
used for rpc validation required by jsonrpc
Could you please provide rationale for having each of those
packages,
separated from `vdsm' and `vdsm-python'? I need to put proper
explanations into package descriptions so that the users know whether
they should install/remove those packages or not.
Thanks,
Milan
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel