Re: [ovirt-devel] REST API data aggregation

So it does not serve us well. Aggregation of data is one the usual points of using the gateway. Yes microservices are affected by this indeed, but so are we because implementing the aggregation directly in the current engine API layer is hard. Can a simple HTTP/2 to HTTP/AJP gateway be the simplest solution? Our Apache might even have a module for it already. That way you can multiplex all the REST calls using a single tcp connection (and a single SSL negotiation). A custom SSO enabled service like that might be even better as it would be able to skip the authentication layers too and that would lower the engine load. But I am not sure it is possible with the current codebase. Martin On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Tomas Jelinek <tjelinek(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> > I feel like every REST API I've ever worked with has had the aggregation >> > + >> > projection problem. It's like we're trying to use REST as a replacement >> > for >> > SQL -- but the logic that executes the "SQL" lives in a browser now, and >> > it >> > used to live on a server close to the DB. And REST isn't expressive for >> > selecting data like SQL is. >> >> The current industry solution I know about is called API gateway.. >> most of the big players have internal API with lots of low level stuff >> and then couple of external API gateways tailored to what the client >> needs. >> >> http://microservices.io/patterns/apigateway.html (check the backend >> for frontend section) >> >> This trend is also visible when you think about services that offer >> API gateway management and billing like >> https://aws.amazon.com/api-gateway/ or our very own >> https://www.3scale.net/ > > > right, but the api gateway solves 2 problems: > > 1: if you have a microservice architecture it is hard for frontend to talk > to 20 different moving services. So the gateway hides this complexity behind > it. This is not the problem we have. > > > >> >> >> >> Martin >> >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > I feel like every REST API I've ever worked with has had the aggregation >> > + >> > projection problem. It's like we're trying to use REST as a replacement >> > for >> > SQL -- but the logic that executes the "SQL" lives in a browser now, and >> > it >> > used to live on a server close to the DB. And REST isn't expressive for >> > selecting data like SQL is. >> > >> > There must be some industry solution to this "I want to do SQL over >> > REST" >> > problem. >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> > for quite some time I have been more or less involved in development >> >> > of >> >> > various UIs for oVirt based entirely on the oVirt's REST API ranging >> >> > from >> >> > the quite mature moVirt [1] through some cockpit extensions to a >> >> > young >> >> > and >> >> > experimental user portal replacement [2]. >> >> >> >> oVirt optimizer has the same issue.. >> >> >> >> > 2: add some tiny service which would just accept a list of queries, >> >> > execute >> >> > them locally (but using real HTTP requests) and return in one bulk. A >> >> > naive >> >> > implementation just to give a sense of what I mean of this would be a >> >> > shell >> >> > script getting list of strings like >> >> > "https://localhost/ovirt-engine/api/vms/123/sessions" iterate over >> >> > them >> >> > and >> >> > do a curl request for each, mangle the results into one string and >> >> > return >> >> > (credits for this idea to msivak). Easy to implement, possibility to >> >> > add >> >> > also projections later to save some bandwidth. But the API would >> >> > anyway >> >> > be >> >> > hammered by bunch of queries, only the network roundtrip would be >> >> > saved. >> >> >> >> The biggest cost for (especially mobile) clients is the cost of >> >> establishing new SSL connection. SSL is also pretty expensive on the >> >> server side. >> >> >> >> So running the aggregation service on the ovirt-engine machine (behind >> >> Apache) means the client will do a single SSL request with list of N >> >> urls and the local "reverse-proxy" will perform single authentication >> >> and N plain HTTP requests (or even better - AJP). It won't remove any >> >> time from the actual command run time, but it will reduce protocol >> >> overhead. >> >> >> >> I think this is the simplest first step that requires almost no change >> >> to existing infrastructure. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Martin Sivak >> >> SLA / oVirt >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tomas Jelinek <tjelinek(a)redhat.com&gt; >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> >> > >> >> > for quite some time I have been more or less involved in development >> >> > of >> >> > various UIs for oVirt based entirely on the oVirt's REST API ranging >> >> > from >> >> > the quite mature moVirt [1] through some cockpit extensions to a >> >> > young >> >> > and >> >> > experimental user portal replacement [2]. >> >> > >> >> > One issue we hit over and over again is the missing data aggregation. >> >> > In >> >> > the >> >> > 3.x era we used to use in moVirt the detail=something >> >> > api to get the disks and nics of the VM, something like: >> >> > >> >> > GET /ovirt-engine/api/vms >> >> > Accept: application/json; detail=disks >> >> > >> >> > This allowed us to store this data in local database leading to great >> >> > user >> >> > experience. Since this feature has been removed in 4.x API [3] >> >> > we needed to retire to a different solution. When the VM detail is >> >> > selected >> >> > by the user, start loading the disks and nics and hope the user >> >> > will not be fast enough to see the delay. The UX is slightly worse >> >> > bug >> >> > kinda >> >> > acceptable. >> >> > >> >> > We hit this issue harder in the new user portal [2], because we >> >> > already >> >> > have >> >> > the VM cached and show the whole VM in one screen. So, if you pick >> >> > it, >> >> > you >> >> > will get it's details immediately. >> >> > But, since you don't have all the details, we need to do an >> >> > additional >> >> > call >> >> > (two actually) to load this data and they start to appear later. >> >> > So, something which would be very fast and smooth starts to feel >> >> > sluggish. >> >> > >> >> > Recently, we hit this issue again which forced us to sacrifice the UX >> >> > even >> >> > more - it is the "console in use" feature of user portal. >> >> > The use case is this: >> >> > - if the console is already taken by some user, there are >> >> > complications >> >> > if >> >> > other current user tryes to take it as well (will avoid details about >> >> > settings and permissins involved, but long story short, the user will >> >> > probably not be allowed to connect to it. The "probably" is the key >> >> > here >> >> > since we can not do any intelligent decision in advance, we can only >> >> > warn >> >> > the user that the console is taken). >> >> > - in the current GWT user portal, if the VM's console is taken, it is >> >> > shown >> >> > on the VM's "box" that "console is taken". This was a highly >> >> > requested >> >> > feature >> >> > - to get this information using the current REST API, we need to go >> >> > to >> >> > the >> >> > /vms/<vmid>/sessions subcollection. To get this for all VMs, it would >> >> > be >> >> > doing N queries per poll which we can not afford >> >> > - so the current PR [4] will probably end up to only check it on the >> >> > attempt >> >> > to connect to the console warning the user. Maybe it will be also >> >> > shown >> >> > in >> >> > Vm details. But the UX in case the user will look for a VM which has >> >> > free >> >> > console will suffer significantly (e.g. try one by one until some >> >> > opens >> >> > or >> >> > look at details one by one to see if the warning appears (with a >> >> > delay)) >> >> > >> >> > I understand that embedding the details of the VM to the response >> >> > comes >> >> > with >> >> > a cost, namely: >> >> > - performance hit >> >> > - complexity of the API code >> >> > - the "cleanness" of REST suffers >> >> > >> >> > But I think we should seriously consider to provide some option to >> >> > data >> >> > aggregation. >> >> > >> >> > I know this has been discussed many times with no result, but I think >> >> > it >> >> > is >> >> > time to bring this topic up again. I'll try to summarize the (failed) >> >> > attempts tried so far: >> >> > - the detail=<something> parameter with ad-hoc embedding of data. >> >> > This >> >> > has >> >> > been there and removed in 4.0 [3] >> >> > - the DoctorREST project - e.g. a proxy above the current api. The >> >> > idea >> >> > was >> >> > to create a service which will be independent of the engine itself, >> >> > will >> >> > locally poll the engine's REST, store all data in local (mongo)DB and >> >> > provide a rich api with aggregations and projections and push >> >> > notifications. >> >> > This polling of everything to get the data to DoctorREST proved to be >> >> > pretty >> >> > costy, so also a more invasive approach of pushing data from engine >> >> > to >> >> > doctor has been discused [5]. None of this two approaches have been >> >> > accepted >> >> > (too complicated, too invasive). >> >> > - writing some custom ad-hoc servlet serving only a purpose of one >> >> > frontend >> >> > - this is actually there for the dashboard, but it is not a generic >> >> > solution >> >> > for the other frontends and we really should not develop custom >> >> > "APIs" >> >> > for >> >> > every frontend >> >> > - there were some other proposals discussed (some 3th party solutions >> >> > etc) >> >> > but I think none of them made it even to a PoC >> >> > >> >> > So, now I would try again and try small to get at least some benefit. >> >> > I >> >> > see >> >> > 2 paths we could try: >> >> > 1: embed something which burns us immediatly, e.g. the /sessions into >> >> > VMs. I >> >> > really liked the ;detail=sessions approach, could we move it back? >> >> > 2: add some tiny service which would just accept a list of queries, >> >> > execute >> >> > them locally (but using real HTTP requests) and return in one bulk. A >> >> > naive >> >> > implementation just to give a sense of what I mean of this would be a >> >> > shell >> >> > script getting list of strings like >> >> > "https://localhost/ovirt-engine/api/vms/123/sessions" iterate over >> >> > them >> >> > and >> >> > do a curl request for each, mangle the results into one string and >> >> > return >> >> > (credits for this idea to msivak). Easy to implement, possibility to >> >> > add >> >> > also projections later to save some bandwidth. But the API would >> >> > anyway >> >> > be >> >> > hammered by bunch of queries, only the network roundtrip would be >> >> > saved. >> >> > 3: any other simple approaches? >> >> > >> >> > I honestly prefer the first approach. It is not beautiful, it is not >> >> > REST-ful, but it is easy to implement, very pragmatic and useful. >> >> > What do you think? >> >> > >> >> > Thank you and sorry for the long mail :) >> >> > Tomas >> >> > >> >> > [1]: https://github.com/oVirt/moVirt >> >> > [2]: https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-web-ui >> >> > [3]: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/61260 >> >> > [4]: https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-web-ui/pull/106/ >> >> > [5]: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/45233/ >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Devel mailing list >> >> > Devel(a)ovirt.org >> >> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Devel mailing list >> >> Devel(a)ovirt.org >> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Greg Sheremeta, MBA >> > Red Hat, Inc. >> > Sr. Software Engineer >> > gshereme(a)redhat.com > >