Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review

failed with the default CPU type The whole series was merged, but without the obvious patch (which was abandoned), let me check what the status is. a disk with cow format on glusterfs Patch merged. Martin On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > I'm waiting for last blockers to be fixed for starting a 4.2.0 RC build. > Assignee are in the TO list of this email. > So far we are down to 7 bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat. > com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag%3Ablocker%2B%20target_ > milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost > > Please review them and provide an ETA for the fix. If the bug is marked as > blocker by mistake, please remove the blocker flag and / or postpone the > bug to a later release. > > Bug ID Product Assignee Status Summary > failed with the default CPU type > 1509629 ovirt-engine ahino(a)redhat.com ASSIGNED Cold merge failed to > remove all volumes > 1507277 ovirt-engine eraviv(a)redhat.com POST [RFE][DR] - Vnic Profiles > mapping in VMs register from data storage domain should be supported also > for templates > a disk with cow format on glusterfs > 1488338 ovirt-engine mlipchuk(a)redhat.com NEW SPM host is not moving to > Non-Operational status when blocking its access to storage domain. > 1512534 ovirt-hosted-engine-ha pkliczew(a)redhat.com ASSIGNED SHE > deployment takes too much time and looks like stuck. > 1496719 vdsm edwardh(a)redhat.com POST Port mirroring is not set after VM > migration > > -- > > SANDRO BONAZZOLA > > ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://red.ht/sig> > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> > <http://www.teraplan.it/redhat-osd-2017/> > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >