On 22/11/12 00:02, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:53 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag@redhat.com> To: engine-devel@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:36:58 PM Subject: [Engine-devel] Report vNic Implementation Details
Hi all,
This is a proposal for reporting the vNic implementation details as reported by the guest agent per each vNic.
Please review the wiki and add your comments.
While we're making the change is there anything else we'd want to report - MTU, MAC (since a user might try to override), etc ?
http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/ReportingVnicImplementation
iirc, the fact ip addresses appear under guest info in the api and not under the vnic was a modeling decision. for example, what if guest is using a bridge, or a bond (yes, sounds unlikely, but the point is it may be incorrect to assume ip-vnic relation. michael - do you remember the details of that discussion?
I'd love to know what drove this modeling decision. The use case above is not a typical use case. We know we won't be able to present the guest internal network configuration accurately in some scenarios but if we cover 90% of the use cases correctly I think we should not let perfect be the enemy of (very) good ;)
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel