On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Piotr Kliczewski <piotr.kliczewski@gmail.com> wrote:
One more failure [1]
I posted this: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/73074
Hopefully we can understand this failure better when we reproduce this with the data that fail the checksum.
Partial success, we have now a failing test: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/7618/console
It fail because we don't have a checksum on storage:
expected='9\x19\x00\x00', actual='\x00\x00\x00\x00'
So now we need to understand why the checksum bytes were not written to storage in this test, but was in storage the other 999 tests.
Tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1426762
Nir
[1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/7610/console
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Piotr Kliczewski <piotr.kliczewski@gmail.com> wrote:
Nir,
I saw this issue in [1]:
10:20:12 FAIL: test_send_receive (storage_mailbox_test.TestMailbox) 10:20:12 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 10:20:12 Traceback (most recent call last): 10:20:12 File "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc25-x86_64/vdsm/tests/storage_mailbox_test.py", line 132, in test_send_receive 10:20:12 self.assertFalse(expired, 'message was not processed on time') 10:20:12 AssertionError: message was not processed on time
it is something known?
Thanks, Piotr
[1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc25-x86_64/1541/consol...