3:29 p.m.
Again, I should understand the direction you ack here ... and its not clear
in any way I try to read it
lets summaries current status:
master == v4.17.999 (I recalled 4.18 tag for 4.0... probably it hasn't
happened yet)
ovit-3.6.3 last commit points to v4.17.23 (and also contains in its history
4.17.22 4.17.21 4.17.20 and 4.17.19
ovirt-3.6 == was not tagged since v4.17.19
So, as far as I see - last "official published" version is tagged anyway.
once we'll finish with z-streams, we can continue tagging only on ovirt-3.6
branch. but as long as we publish new snapshots (or z-stream releases as I
call them) we can continue the tagging only on ovirt-3.6.3 branch
The rest of your suggestions can't help in any way. if you prefer you can
use 4th level versioning (4.17.x-y) later on. but currently we just
continue to raise the current 4.17 we have
now, getting back to the origin mail that Sandro sent:
""" snip
vdsm-4.17.19-32.git171584b.el7.centos.src.rpm
<http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_3.6_build-artifacts-el7-x86_64/178/arti...
because
the last tag on the 3.6 branch was 4.17.19 and new tags have been created
in different branches.
this is correct - no problem with that approach, new tag still will be
higher then 4.17.19 as we see with 4.17.23
This make impossible to upgrade from stable (4.17.23) to latest
snapshot.
But we just said that stable (ovirt-3.6) is 4.17.19 and latest is 4.17.23 -
so it sounds right to me.
This also break dependencies on other projects requiring the latest
released version like hosted engine.
No its not. HE may require 4.17.23 which is the latest we publish as part
of 3.6.3
"""
Yaniv Bronhaim.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:06:32PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Yaniv Bronheim" <ybronhei(a)redhat.com>
> >> > To: "Martin Perina" <mperina(a)redhat.com>
> >> > Cc: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>, "Sandro
Bonazzola"
> >> > <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>, "Francesco Romani"
> >> > <fromani(a)redhat.com>, "Dan Kenigsberg"
<danken(a)redhat.com>, "devel"
> >> > <devel(a)ovirt.org>
> >> > Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 8:16:05 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] vdsm versioning
> >> > system need to be fixed
> >> >
> >> > I don't understand what's the different .. that's what we
currently
do.
> >> > Sandro complains that he can't upgrade latest stable which can be
> >> > 4.17.23
> >> > to latest snapshot which can be 4.17.19.88 \ 4.17.19-88 - yum
can't
> >> > consider that as an upgrade and 4.17.19.88 can't fill HE
requirement for
> >> > 4.17.23
> >>
> >> oVirt 3.6 stable release:
> >> - current [1]: vdsm-4.17.23-0.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> >> - desired: vdsm-4.17.23-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> >>
> >> oVirt 3.6 stable snapshot:
> >> - current [2]: vdsm-4.17.19-32.git171584b.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> >> - desired: vdsm-4.17.24-0.1.git171584b.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> >>
> >> oVirt master snapshot:
> >> - current [3]: vdsm-4.17.999-680.gitd87d031.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> >> - desired: vdsm-4.18.0-0.680.gitd87d031.el7.centos.noarch.rpm or
> >> vdsm-5.0.0-0.680.gitd87d031.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> >> (not sure what will be oVirt 4 vdsm version)
> >>
> >
> >
> > +1
the down side of that is that we'd need to forsake our ability to
release a new version by a mere `git tag`, and would have to include a
version bump commit instead.
--
*Yaniv Bronhaim.*