
7 Feb
2013
7 Feb
'13
3:54 a.m.
Hi Tomas, I've couple of comments, mainly from User POV. Currently: - we've many useful information, but only on Template tab. Once user (administrator) wants create new VM, he HAVE TO go to template tab, remember/write down name of template & then went back to VM tab & create Vm from desired template. New after this change: - Administrator will go to tree - clicks few times (or just once in case is expanded by default), then to DC then to Template tab. Overall at lest +1 click => almost EACH time someone needs to create VM? What if we bring these changes? - Create VM window will show as much info about template as possible - Description, NICs, list pf apps! (there is plenty useless space in gray area on top of this window above/top/between {DC & CLUSTER}) - as much info as possible (VM subtab on Hosts/Templates main tabs) - links between entities which are leading to different entities - once I'm in template VM subtab, why I can't click to button & be transferred to VM tab to see all info about this VM? After mentioned changes I don't really care in which layer or how deep tabs are. Currently we're adding/deleting tabs in each release in a loop. P. On Thursday 07 of February 2013 04:18:36 Tomas Jelinek wrote: > I have completed the "User Interface" part (e.g. where the Images, Instance > Types and Templates main tabs will be). > http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Instance_Types#User_Interface > > Your comments are welcome, > Tomas > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek@redhat.com> > To: "Oved Ourfalli" <ovedo@redhat.com> > Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 5:14:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Instance Types Feature > > > 1. Why do we need a new set of permissions for "Create Instance" and > > "Instance Owner"? Aren't the VmCreator role and the UserVmManager role > > enough in these use-cases? > so checked this with Andy: > - Create Instance: it is a permission to actually see the instance types in > the list of instance types when creating the VM and to be able to create a > VM from that instance type - Instance Owner: if the user has this > permission, he can edit the fields marked as "Basic User" in the table in > the wiki (but not the others) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Oved Ourfalli" <ovedo@redhat.com> > To: "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek@redhat.com> > Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:54:13 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Instance Types Feature > > Some questions: > 1. Why do we need a new set of permissions for "Create Instance" and > "Instance Owner"? Aren't the VmCreator role and the UserVmManager role > enough in these use-cases? 2. iiuc, the internal implementation of instance > types and images will be done using templates. However, I guess we plan to > expose instance types and images as REST resources, right? > > Thank you, > Oved > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek@redhat.com> > > To: engine-devel@ovirt.org > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:09:51 PM > > Subject: [Engine-devel] Instance Types Feature > > > > Hi All, > > > > this is the proposed new feature called instance types: > > http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Instance_Types > > > > Long story short - it should basically split the VM template into: > > - "hardware profile" called instance types > > - "software profile" called image > > > > This should enable to do something like: Create a new "small" VM and > > attach a disk with "RHEL + Postgres" installed. > > > > Any comments are more than welcome! > > > > Tomas > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel