Il 24/09/2014 09:44, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
On 24/09/14 09:13, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
You probably missed the first part "we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in the spec file". In that case you won't fail in any requirement.
Basically the question is: was there any problem on centos6 before committing http://gerrit.ovirt.org/31214 ?
Federico: as we checked a few minutes ago, it seems there's no problem in requiring qemu-kvm/qemu-img in the spec file. Only issue is that if non rhev version is installed a manual "yum update" is required for moving to the rhevm version.
Of course there was a problem, please follow the link in this very commit to the according bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127763
In short: you can not use live snapshots without this updated spec file.
And it's a PITA to install this package by hand, you must track it's versions yourself etc pp. you basically lose all the stuff a proper spec file gives you.
Well, since the -rhev package is now available in 3.4, 3.5 and master repos it shouldn't be a PITA anymore.
PS: I also don't get the "we want to get vdsm in every distribution" a) it was never in any distro, it was in epel, which is a third party repository anyway, so you can just provide it via ovirt repo imho. b) no one packages vdsm for debian, ubuntu, gentoo, arch, suse, $nameyourdistro or I completely missed it, so why treat fedora in a special way? Don't misunderstand me, it would be cool if you have packages for every distro, or even bsd based stuff, but I think this is still a long way. c) will anyone use vdsm without ovirt? is this even possible? so imho you need ovirt repos anyway?
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com