Re: [ovirt-devel] Fwd: [oVirt Jenkins] test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master - Build #4658 - FAILURE!

As long as we have networking issues, I don't think it's worth looking into other issues. Example: 2017-01-10 10:04:57,844-05 DEBUG [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.internal.ResponseWorker] (ResponseWorker) [] Message received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":"192.168.201.2:1671737550","message":"Vds timeout occured"},"id":null} 2017-01-10 10:04:57,849-05 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (DefaultQuartzScheduler7) [11ef43b9] Correlation ID: null, Call Stack: null, Custom Event ID: -1, Message: VDSM command failed: Message timeout which can be caused by communication issues 2017-01-10 10:04:57,849-05 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand] (DefaultQuartzScheduler7) [11ef43b9] ERROR, GetStoragePoolInfoVDSCommand( GetStoragePoolInfoVDSCommandParameters: {runAsync='true', storagePoolId='33d94705-e33d-4a47-8e38-033ad2f7eec5', ignoreFailoverLimit='true'}), exception: VDSGenericException: VDSNetworkException: Message timeout which can be caused by communication issues, log id: 65d698d6 2017-01-10 10:04:57,850-05 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand] (DefaultQuartzScheduler7) [11ef43b9] Exception: org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VDSNetworkException: VDSGenericException: VDSNetworkException: Message timeout which can be caused by communication issues at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.BrokerCommandBase.proceedProxyReturnValue(BrokerCommandBase.java:188) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.GetStoragePoolInfoVDSCommand.executeIrsBrokerCommand(GetStoragePoolInfoVDSCommand.java:32) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand.lambda$executeVDSCommand$0(IrsBrokerCommand.java:95) [vdsbroker.jar:] why do we have so many of them all along (grep for 11ef43b9 found several of those). Y. On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Piotr Kliczewski < piotr.kliczewski(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: