On 03/07/2017 06:06 PM, Marc Young wrote:
Completely isolated docker containers. Jenkins basically runs two separate calls to docker...
[vagrant-1.9.1] $ docker run -t -d -u 997:994 -v /opt/gemcache:/opt/gemcache -w /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ -v /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:rw -v /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:rw -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** --entrypoint cat myoung34/vagrant:1.9.1 [Pipeline] [vagrant-1.9.1] {
[Pipeline] [vagrant-1.9.2] withDockerContainer [vagrant-1.9.2] $ docker run -t -d -u 997:994 -v /opt/gemcache:/opt/gemcache -w /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ -v /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:rw -v /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:rw -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** --entrypoint cat myoung34/vagrant:1.9.2
Each of those containers in turn runs:
+gem build *.gemspec +/usr/bin/vagrant plugin install *.gem +bundle install --path /opt/gemcache --without development plugins +bundle exec kitchen destroy all +rm -rf .kitchen +sleep \$(shuf -i 0-10 -n 1) #i did this to see if maybe i could stagger the creates +export VAGRANT_VERSION=\$(echo ${vagrantVersion} | sed 's/\\.//g') +bundle exec kitchen test ^[^singleton-]
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Juan Hernández <jhernand@redhat.com <mailto:jhernand@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 03/07/2017 05:42 PM, Marc Young wrote: > I've been fighting this for roughly two days and I'm starting to think > that possibly it's not my code but an interaction with the server. > > I'm using test-kitchen[1] with the kitchen-vagrant[2] driver to spin up > vagrant machines and run tests against them. I'm using Jenkins to run > kitchen in containers in parallel. > > Basically Jenkins runs a docker container with ruby + vagrant 1.9.2 and > runs kitchen test all at the same time as another container with ruby + > vagrant 1.9.1. > > If I run these in parallel, on some occasions the server seems to > respond with the wrong creation information. If you look at the logs > here: http://home.blindrage.us:8080/job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovirt4/view/change-re... <http://home.blindrage.us:8080/job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovirt4/view/change-requests/job/PR-79/41/console> > <http://home.blindrage.us:8080/job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovirt4/view/change-re... <http://home.blindrage.us:8080/job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovirt4/view/change-requests/job/PR-79/41/console>> > > > the container for vagrant 1.9.1 created a VM `vagrant-dynamic-1.9.1: > > [vagrant-1.9.1] Bringing machine 'default' up with 'ovirt4' provider... > > [vagrant-1.9.1] ==> default: Creating VM with the following settings... > > [vagrant-1.9.1] ==> default: -- Name: dynamic-1.9.1 > > > And the container for vagrant 1.9.2 (nearly the same time) created a VM > `vagrant-dynamic-1.9.2`: > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: Creating VM with the following settings... > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: -- Name: dynamic-1.9.2 > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: -- Cluster: Default > > > If you look at the ss: > > the container 1.9.1 will wait for dynamic-1.9.1 and try to contact it at > 192.168.2.54 > > the container 1.9.2 will wait for dynamic-1.9.2 and try to contact it at > 192.168.2.55 > > But if you look at the logs, the 1.9.1 container started trying to work > with 192.168.2.55 by creating a new key then talking to it: > > [vagrant-1.9.1] default: Key inserted! Disconnecting and reconnecting using new SSH key... > > [vagrant-1.9.1] Waiting for SSH service on 192.168.2.55:22 <http://192.168.2.55:22> <http://192.168.2.55:22>, retrying in 3 seconds > > > Because 1.9.1 inserted a generated key into that box, the 1.9.2 > container which _should_ be talking to it cannot now: > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: Rsyncing folder: /home/jenkins/.kitchen/cache/ => /tmp/omnibus/cache > [vagrant-1.9.2] SSH authentication failed! This is typically caused by the public/private > [vagrant-1.9.2] keypair for the SSH user not being properly set on the guest VM. Please > [vagrant-1.9.2] verify that the guest VM is setup with the proper public key, and that > [vagrant-1.9.2] the private key path for Vagrant is setup properly as well. > > > > Via the ruby sdk I create the VM and store the ID it responded with. > Then to get the IP: >
Can you share this ^ code that creates and stores the ID of the virtual machine?
> server = env[:vms_service].vm_service(env[:machine].id) > nics_service = server.nics_service > nics = nics_service.list > ip_addr = nics.collect { |nic_attachment| > env[:connection].follow_link(nic_attachment).reported_devices.collect { > |dev| dev.ips.collect { |ip| ip.address if ip.version == 'v4' } } > }.flatten.reject { |ip| ip.nil? }.first rescue nil >
Is this code running inside the same Ruby process for both virtual machines? In multiple threads?
> Given this code I can't think of any way that I would get the wrong IP > unless somehow the server responded incorrectly, since the NIC's i've > scanned and compiled across are tied directly to the server I created. > > Any thoughts? This only happpens randomly and it seems to happen if I > bombard the server with a bunch of VM creations simultaneously > > [1] https://github.com/test-kitchen/test-kitchen <https://github.com/test-kitchen/test-kitchen> > [2] https://github.com/test-kitchen/kitchen-vagrant <https://github.com/test-kitchen/kitchen-vagrant> > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@ovirt.org <mailto:Devel@ovirt.org> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel> >