can you tell me when will we merge the patch? as I rather not add SkipTest
if this will be merged soon,
thanks,
Dafna
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:42 AM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
As I had another failure of this today I will be disabling this test
until
issue is resolved (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1684267)
Thanks,
Dafna
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:48 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:52 AM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a failure on the project in basic suite, master branch. The
>> recent failure was in patch:
>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98087/1 - Add pre-seed for ovirt-web-ui
>>
>> CQ is pointing at the below as the root cause (which was merged a while
>> back):
>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/97491/ - Add pre-seed for ovirt-web-ui
>>
>> Can you please check the issue as it seems both patches are changing the
>> same thing and the project seem to be broken since
>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/97491/3
>>
>> Latest failure:
>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/13171/
>>
>> Logs:
>>
>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/13171/arti...
>>
>> errors from logs:
>> Engine:
>>
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,479-05 ERROR
>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand] (default task-1) [74283e25]
>> Transaction rolled-back for command
>> 'org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand'.
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,483-05 ERROR
>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
>> (default task-1) [74283e25] EVENT_ID: USER_FAILED_UPDATE_VM(58), Failed to
>> update VM vm2 (User: admin@inter
>> nal-authz).
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,485-05 INFO
>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand] (default task-1) [74283e25]
>> Lock freed to object 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[vm2=VM_NAME]',
>> sharedLocks='[3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea
>> 02d9f6adee=VM]'}'
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,485-05 DEBUG
>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor]
>> (default task-1) [74283e25] method: runAction, params: [UpdateVm,
>> VmManagementParametersBase:{commandId='340
>> 59769-05b9-429e-8356-f6b9b9953f55', user='admin',
>> commandType='UpdateVm',
vmId='3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee'}],
>> timeElapsed: 6618ms
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,486-05 ERROR
>> [org.ovirt.engine.api.restapi.resource.AbstractBackendResource] (default
>> task-1) [] Operation Failed: []
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,579-05 DEBUG
>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor]
>> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-85) [] method: get, params:
>> [e29c0ba1-464c-4eb4-a8f2-c6933d9
>> 9969a], timeElapsed: 3ms
>>
>>
>> vdsm:
>>
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:21,987-0500 INFO (jsonrpc/1) [vdsm.api] FINISH
>> lease_info error=No such lease 3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee
>> from=::ffff:192.168.201.4,43920,
>> flow_id=117dec74-ad59-4b12-8148-b2c130337c10,
>> task_id=9c297d41-0aa7-4c74-b268-b710e666bc6c (api:52)
>> 2019-02-27 13:37:21,988-0500 ERROR (jsonrpc/1)
>> [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='9c297d41-0aa7-4c74-b268-b710e666bc6c')
>> Unexpected error (task:875)
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line
>> 882, in _run
>> return fn(*args, **kargs)
>> File "<string>", line 2, in lease_info
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50,
>> in method
>> ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line
>> 3702, in lease_info
>> info = dom.lease_info(lease.lease_id)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line
674,
>> in lease_info
>> return vol.lookup(lease_id)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/xlease.py", line
>> 553, in lookup
>> raise NoSuchLease(lease_id)
>> NoSuchLease: No such lease 3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee
>>
>
> This is not an error of vdsm. Someone asked for information about a
> non-existing lease,
> and vdsm fail the request with the expected error:
>
> NoSuchLease: No such lease 3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee
>
> But since the error is not a public error, vdsm logger handle it as
> unexpected error and
> create lot of noise in vdsm log.
>
> On engine side, this creates even worse noise, as we can see here:
>
>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/13171/arti...
> (look for 2019-02-27 13:37:21,996-05)
>
> All these noise could be avoided if vdsm was using a proper public error.
> I filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1684267
>
> But, this error is not related to the actual failing test, this is just
> noise hiding the real problem.
>
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> Nir
>