5:44 a.m.
On 02/18/2015 11:10 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
Hi,
This is about the changes introduced by patch
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/35281 (restapi: adjust api to new
graphics representation).
There are a couple of issues with the VM's display type value:
(1) the "display -> type" value of the VM in the REST API seem to
map to different properties based on the VM status.
see http://i.imgur.com/Mn1RITW.png:
When the VM is Up, the "display -> type" value in the REST API
matches the 'Display' value in the GUI.
But when the VM is Down, the "display -> type" value in the REST
API matches the 'Graphics Protocol' value in the GUI and does not
necessarily match the 'Display' value (e.g. in case we invoked
'Run Once' on the VM with a different Console value).
Is there a reason for the values in the REST API to not match the
ones in the GUI? it's a bit confusing.
Maybe need to have two properties in the REST API to match the two
displayed values in the GUI: 'Display' (which, IIUC, is the 'run-
time' value) and 'Graphics Protocol' (which, IIUC, is the
'configured'/persisted value)?
I understand that there may be backward-compatibility issues with
naming/terminology, but perhaps we can come up with a solution that
will not break the backward compatibility?
This behavior wasn't introduced by that patch, rather the patch was
carefully crafted to preserve it, for backwards compatibility.
My understanding is that the virt team plans to do larger changes to
this area of the RESTAPI to reflect the new separation of the "video
device" and "graphics device" concepts. I think that your concerns can
be handled in the context of those larger changes.
(2) in patch http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/35281, it seems that the
REST API is calling a query *per VM* in order to re-populate the
display-related values.
This will potentially overload the engine, especially if we are
planning to move the GUI to work over the REST API and request
VMs every 5 seconds (by default) per client, as we are doing today.
Are there any plans to optimize this behavior (e.g. populate the
correct display-related values on the db-side, rather than re-
populating them on the REST-API side using a per-VM query)?
Currently there are no plans to change this because the backend doesn't
have a mechanism to provide all the related display information using
only one query. I'd suggest to implement at least a query that takes
multiple VM identifiers and returns the graphics devices of those
multiple VMs. This would allow for a 1+1 queries scenario, instead of
1+N. Once the backend provides this the RESTAPI can be changed to use
it. This is for the virt team to decide, I'd suggest you open a bug.
Many thanks in advance.
----
Regards,
Einav
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.