On 20/05/12 21:41, Dor Laor wrote:
On 05/17/2012 11:15 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
On 17/05/12 20:28, Ayal Baron wrote:
"Live migration will not be supported for such VM's."
Migration will work on homogeneous clusters so this should not be enforced (not limited to VMs which are pinned to host) just give a warning.
I agree, but if we wish to ping vCPUx to pCPUy in host a, we cannot ensure to have the same in host b, since it may have pCPUy too busy, so performance will degrade. Also, I hope you saw my general comment
Performance may degrade on any migration to loaded host regardless of pinning.
There is not need to forbid migration. Instead, the SLA assurance policy should verify the dedicated resources and match the target w/ the guarantee and decide according to this.
Thanks for the input. We may start with migration blocked in a configurable manner, so people who wish migrate to work will simply set the relevant configuration key. As for looking for a matched CPU, will add it as p2.
about starting with a humble solution and gradually improving. In this context (auto)numa can help us, so we better do numa than handle migration for basic mode, risking performance issues.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doron Fediuck"<dfediuck@redhat.com> To: engine-devel@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:42:46 PM Subject: [Engine-devel] CPU Pinning @engine
Hi All, Currently the VDSM has a CPU pinning hook. We'd like to add better support of it into the engine itself. Here's a design draft to cover it: http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Design/cpu-pinning
Please review and comment if needed.
Thanks! --
/d
Never say "OOPS!" always say "Ah, Interesting!" _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
-- /d Never say "OOPS!" always say "Ah, Interesting!"