On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Heya,
>
> the size went down to ~800MB again in master.
>
> The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree.
> The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack
> which we are pulling in.
>
>
You can drop it by requireing java headless instead of java at runtime in
ovirt-engine I think.
I've opened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401931 to track
this
issue.
Y.
> - fabian
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big.
> > 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2].
> > Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Y.
> >
> > [1]
> >
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7
> /noarch/ovirt-engine-appliance-4.1-20160927.1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> > [2]
> >
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0-snapshot/rpm/el7/
> noarch/ovirt-engine-appliance-4.0-20161003.1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel(a)ovirt.org
> >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
> --
> Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch(a)redhat.com>
> Associate Manager, RHV Hypervisor
> Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com