Re: [ovirt-devel] VDSM master fc24 build artifacts fails

I can't start latest master engine (just fetched) with the same error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.py", line 32, in <module> from ovirt_engine import service File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_engine/service.py", line 35, in <module> from dateutil import tz ImportError: No module named dateutil

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >>> > >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told > >>> Sandro that it is his call. > >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation > >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. > >>> > >>> Thanks all > >>> Gil > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vd > sm/vdsm_standard.yaml > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only > >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. > >>>> > >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24 > >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time. > >> > >> > >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it > cannot be > >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... > >> > >> [1] > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075 > > > > > > > > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status. > > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to > be > > able to build and run it. > > We can't leave CI broken. > > Which CI job is broken with f25? > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Greg Sheremeta, MBA Red Hat, Inc. Sr. Software Engineer gshereme(a)redhat.com