I'd love to have such handling also in our rpm build.. we started some work in https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/42491 , lets try to align the handling in both debian and fedora packaging. feel free to post a patch for that as well and I promise to push it forward On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> writes:
Note that safeelase requires several packages which are *not* required for safelease, but for vdsm.
Currently vdsm is noarch rpm, so it cannot require arch specific packages. since it requires safelease, we added arch specific packages to safelease.
Thank you for making me aware about those dependencies. The same problem exists in Debian, I'll think how to handle it (making vdsm package architecture specific being the obvious default choice, the safelease hack is out question). _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- *Yaniv Bronhaim.*