----- Original Message -----
From: "Yaniv Kaul" <ykaul@redhat.com> To: "Roy Golan" <rgolan@redhat.com> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 5:10:16 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks
On 02/06/2012 04:47 PM, Roy Golan wrote:
Hi All
Lately I've been working on a design of bridge-less network feature in the engine. You can see it in http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Design/Network/Bridgeless_Networks#Bridge...
Please review the design. Note, there are some open issues, you can find in the relevant section. Reviews and comments are very welcome.
Thanks, Roy _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
0. Fixed some typos in the wiki. There are others I couldn't understand. 1. "Also looking forward a capable of running VMs nics should be bridged on regular nics and un-bridged in case of dedicated special nics" - don't understand what it means (English-wise too). correct, the phrasing is bad. I meant that when we are doing the actual attach, should we implicitly choose not to create a bridge on vNic or SRIOV ? Anyway for now the best and fastest approach I think is to give freedom of choice - the user will choose if the network should be bridged or not during the attach.
2. "UI shall user shall" . 3. Not sure the REST API is complete. How is the property set on the logical network (upon creation or later) ? please see my former post. I suggest we won't have this property on the logical network at all. 4. So, if there's no bridge on my bond, can I now use the bond methods that are incompatible with bridges and therefore we did not allow them until now? why not? is VDSM blocking those?
Y.