Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yaniv Kaul" <ykaul(a)redhat.com>
To: "Roy Golan" <rgolan(a)redhat.com>
Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 5:10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks
On 02/06/2012 04:47 PM, Roy Golan wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Lately I've been working on a design of bridge-less network feature
> in the engine.
> You can see it in
>
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Design/Network/Bridgeless_Networks#Bri...
>
> Please review the design.
> Note, there are some open issues, you can find in the relevant
> section.
> Reviews and comments are very welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Roy
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
0. Fixed some typos in the wiki. There are others I couldn't
understand.
1. "Also looking forward a capable of running VMs nics should be
bridged
on regular nics and un-bridged in case of dedicated special nics" -
don't understand what it means (English-wise too).
correct, the phrasing is
bad. I meant that when we are doing the actual attach, should
we implicitly choose not to create a bridge on vNic or SRIOV ?
Anyway for now the best and fastest approach I think is to give freedom of choice - the
user will choose
if the network should be bridged or not during the attach.
2. "UI shall user shall" .
3. Not sure the REST API is complete. How is the property set on the
logical network (upon creation or later) ?
please see my former post. I suggest we
won't have this property on the logical network at all.
4. So, if there's no bridge on my bond, can I now use the bond
methods
that are incompatible with bridges and therefore we did not allow
them
until now?
why not? is VDSM blocking those?
Y.