Re: [ovirt-devel] Fwd: Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few more days before filing the actual bugs. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto(a)mit.edu&gt; wrote: > Hi everyone- > > This is a notice in accordance with the mass bug filing procedure. > > A number of packages install systemd units and enable them > automatically. They should not. Please update these packages to use the > macroized scriptlet > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd). > > If your package has an exception from FESCo permitting it to enable > itself, please make sure that the service in question is listed in the > appropriate preset file. > > There is a general exception described here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Starting_services_by_default > > If your package falls under the general exception, then it is possible > that no change is required. Nevertheless, if you are relying on the > exception, please make sure that your rpm scripts are sensible. The > exception is: > > In addition, any service which does not remain persistent on the > system (aka, it "runs once then goes away"), does not listen to > incoming connections during initialization, and does not require > configuration to be functional may be enabled by default (but is not > required to do so). An example of "runs once then goes away" service > is iptables. > > Given that this issue can affect Fedora 20 users who install your > package as a dependency, these bugs should be fixed in Fedora 20 and > Rawhide. > > The tracker bug is here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090684 > > I created it early because three of the bugs are pre-existing. Next > week, I'll file bugs against the packages below. If you fix your > package in the mean time, please let me know. > > After three weeks, provenpackagers may step in and fix these issues. >

vdsm