Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
On 28/05/12 21:31, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/28/2012 02:35 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
> Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it
> explicitly, so I'll just go with that.
>
> If someone feels strongly against, please reply.
I still like 'label' better.
it doesn't have the context of a unique id, and is much more correct to
what this is - allows the user to label a command (or a set of commands).
but also doesn't imply it's unique in any way (i.e., it's like a
"tag",
just a better, non overloaded term for it).
I think that flow-id is confusing. This id has nothing to do with flow,
it can aggregate multiple commands and it is not associated with a
specific user flow.
Correlation-Id is a common name for such Id, we took it from the
terminology used in JMS queues, but Microsoft and Oracle are using CID too.
* http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=23842
*
http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/blogs/GetThePoint/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?I...
*
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B14099_19/integrate.1012/b25709/com/oracle/bpel...
>
> Ori
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Pasternak"<mpastern(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Moti Asayag"<masayag(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Ori Liel"<oliel(a)redhat.com>, engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 2:26:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
>
> On 05/15/2012 05:31 PM, Moti Asayag wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 02:19 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
>>>> No decision about the name of the parameter yet, and this is
>>>> blocking me.
>>>>
>>>> Names that were suggested so far:
>>>>
>>>> * flow-id
>
> +1
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel