On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 9:44 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Il giorno mer 17 nov 2021 alle ore 03:12 Danilo de Paula <
ddepaula(a)redhat.com> ha scritto:
> Since you're consuming the CentOS Stream 8 packages (I assume) and the
> CentOS Stream 8 is actually the opened development of the next RHEL minor
> release (8.6) [1], it makes
> a lot of sense to open BZs against those packages in RHEL-8.6.
>
> Especially since we won't fix those problems in CentOS Stream without
> fixing it in RHEL first.
>
> So, if you believe that this is a problem with the package itself (as it
> looks like), I strongly suggest opening a BZ against those packages in RHEL.
>
Didi can you please open a bug against RHEL 8 CentoStream version for
qemu-kvm component?
Michal searched and found:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/641
And indeed it seems to be our case:
[root@ost-he-basic-suite-master-host-0 ~]# ps uaxww | grep qemu | sed 's/
/\n/g' | grep ^pcie-root-port | wc
17 17 1160
Danilo - the gitlab page above mentions several patches linking to it
already, some of which from the last few days. I didn't check them. Is
there still value in opening a bug, or is the issue already sufficiently
clear?
That said, I failed to verify this using isa-debugcon as mentioned there,
and the various things the command uses (FDs, storage) are temporary -
created on the fly by libvirt/vdsm - so I can't just copy the command and
add a few options. If needed I guess it's possible to hack this using a
vdsm hook or something.
For the time being, is there a workaround/temporary-build/whatever other
than downgrading to qemu-kvm-6.0.0 (which is considered deprecated, I guess
- e.g. Sandro is going to remove it from ovirt-release package (
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-release/pull/2 ), following the thread
"[CentOS-devel] Is advanced-virt (Virtualization SIG) not relevant anymore
with latest CentOS Stream 8?")?
>
> [1] - This is only true for CentOS Stream 8 (which is a copy of RHEL).
> CentOS Stream 9 is the other way around.
>
Sadly no, from my experience it's still fix in rhel first and then in
CentOS Stream, at least for systemd on CentOS Stream 9.
I would love to see fixes coming to Stream first.
Best regards,
--
Didi