On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
2017-12-18 8:37 GMT+01:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
2017-12-18 8:29 GMT+01:00 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com>:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag% 3Ablocker%2B%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew %2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers.
We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag% 3Ablocker%3F%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew %2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
1525907 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> Storage vdsm General danken@redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a restart in fresh install... <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> urgent urgent ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12
Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we can postpone to 4.2.1.
I don't think it is for me to review.
The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to claim that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for Simone to reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam, that this is a problem of host connectivity to its storage?
Adam, Nir, Tal, Allon, can you please review?
Any update?
+Meital.