>
>>> Floating disks should be both in the root context, and also in the VM
>>> context for each VM the floating disk is attached to, right? So floating
>>> disks would appear 1+N_attach times in the API, once in the root
>>> context, and once for each VM they are attached to.
>>>
>>
>> IIUC a floating disk is not associated with the VM in any way, and should
>> not appear in that VM's collection of disks. There's a similar feature
of
>> activate/deactivate disk (
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/HotPlug).
>> A deactivated disk is still associated with the VM, and should appear in
>> the VM's collection of disks. Perhaps this is the source of confusion.
>
> No that isn't it. I think have a bit of terminology mismatch. According to:
>
>
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/DetailedFloatingDisk
>
> i think your use of the word floating is correct. I got confused as i
> thought that any disk could be floating, whether it was attached to 0
> VMs, 1 VM, or 2 or more VMs.
>
> So before we go further, let's get things straight:
>
> - disk without any VMs => floating. It appears in the root context.
> - disk attached to 1 VM => normal state. It appears in the VM context.
I think this type of disk should be shown in both contexts.
If a user is looking at http://{host:port}/disks, I think he intuitively
expects to see all disks (attached or unattached). A disk will contain
reference to the VMs which it is attached to, and thus:
- No VM-ids --> floating disk.
- One VM-id --> regular disk.
- Multiple VM-ids --> shared disk.
iirc, shared disk is a flag on the disk to allow it to be shared.
doesn't mean it is shared yet, rather can be shared.
> - disk attached to 2 VMs => shared disk. It appears in both VM contexts.
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Also can someone explain on how floating and shared disks are actually
> implemented in the BE? I imagine it's one of two ways:
>
> => The BE keep a global list of disks, each disk with zero or more
> references to a VM.
> => The BE keeps a special "floating" state independent of the number
> of VMs that it is attached to.
>
> Thanks,
> Geert
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel