Send from my iPhone . On 28 בדצמ 2011, at 18:21, Livnat Peer <lpeer@redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2011 05:22 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
Few points: - From requirement perspective - 0-10 scale is OK too. - There is an RFE to allow manual SPM selection, let's make sure that we clarify how we do that in the scenarios. - There is a case were all Hosts are set as "no SPM" (-1), user should be notify (on the last host?)
Hi Miki, Can you please elaborate on this validation. When we edit a host it is currently a requirement that the host will be in maintenance. So what do you think the validation should be? That there is at least one host in the cluster that can become spm.
Livnat
- Need to be able to view in the GUI: - the SPM priority for all Hosts, on the GRID? - would love to have the spm-priority avail in the search criteria, so I would serach for all hosts that spm-priority==0/-1
Miki
----- Original Message -----
From: "Muli Salem" <msalem@redhat.com> To: engine-devel@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 3:16:46 PM Subject: [Engine-devel] SPM Priority Design - Wiki Page
Hi all,
In the link below there is a wiki page describing the requirements and design of the SPM Priority feature. The feature allows the admin to define priorities between hosts regarding the SPM selection process
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/SPMPriority
Please feel free to share your comments.
Thanks, Muli _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel