On Aug 28, 2014, at 16:14 , Martin Sivak <msivak@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
yeah I think it should be like that.
+1
* Should it pass the same checks than a Bug-Url? Most probably yes Right now that is: - Public - Target release - Product * Should it change the bug statuses too? Most probably no * Should it update the external trackers of the bug? Most probably yes
-- Martin Sivák msivak@redhat.com Red Hat Czech RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ
----- Original Message -----
On 08/27, Martin Sivak wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask if it might be possible for the gerrit hook to stop giving -1 to patches that do not have bug-url, but have related-to.
The reason for this is that I have a rather large patchset that is adding a new feature. No single patch by itself fixes the referenced bug and there are also patches that are not related to the feature itself, but were backported because they did some refactoring that was needed for the code to apply and/or work properly.
I have a couple question, which of these should happen for the Related-To bugs?
* Should it pass the same checks than a Bug-Url? Most probably yes Right now that is: - Public - Target release - Product * Should it change the bug statuses too? Most probably no * Should it update the external trackers of the bug? Most probably yes
-- Martin Sivák msivak@redhat.com Red Hat Czech RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- David Caro
Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro@redhat.com Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel