On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Moran Goldboim
<mgoldboi(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Moran Goldboim <mgoldboi(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> my pov - really depends on when do we release 4.1.
>>> short version (Dec 16) - we should keep it, and 3.6 api as well
>>> long version (Mar 17) - let's drop it than.
>>>
>>> bottom line - we would like to give customers/community the time to
>>> migrate their el6 base deployment to el7 , while allowing them dual
>>> management infra. by march next year we should be in the 7.4/.next
>>> timeframe - this should be ok to our conservative customer base as well
>>>
>>
>> el6 to el7 host migration should have been done in 3.5. 3.6 doesn't
>> support el6 as hosts...
>>
>>
> busted here - you are right.. :)
> the main point is to allow this deprecation to happen form our
> integration projects and users side. if we will release early - i would
> suggest to keep the support for additional version.
>
Keep support for what exactly? What can use the XML-RPC but our own
internal tools (such as MOM) which we'll convert?
Y.
I was referring to 3.6 engine (part of 3.x engines..)- api.
i don't think we should support 3.5 or xml-rpc.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Yaniv Dary <ydary(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the cost of keeping them?
>>>>
>>>> Yaniv Dary
>>>> Technical Product Manager
>>>> Red Hat Israel Ltd.
>>>> 34 Jerusalem Road
>>>> Building A, 4th floor
>>>> Ra'anana, Israel 4350109
>>>>
>>>> Tel : +972 (9) 7692306
>>>> 8272306
>>>> Email: ydary(a)redhat.com
>>>> IRC : ydary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg
<danken(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:13:40PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>>>> > Hi all,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We should not support now Engine 3.5 with ovirt 4.0, but vdsm
still
>>>>> > accept 3.5 engines - I guess we forgot to disable it in 4.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct. There was a moment in time where we considered supporting
3.5
>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > In 4.1, I don't think we should support any 3.x Engine -
otherwise
>>>>> we
>>>>> > will have to waste time maintaining old apis and
infrastructure,
>>>>> instead
>>>>> > of adding new features that matter to our users.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have a list of old APIs you'd like to throw away?
We've killed
>>>>> a
>>>>> few in 4.0, and
>>>>> $ git grep REQUIRED_FOR
>>>>> is not huge.
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I suggest we disable now support for 3.x engines.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please see Eli patch:
>>>>> >
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/59308
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1, but let's see if ydary/mgoldboi think we should keep 3.6.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sandro Bonazzola
>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>> See how it works at
redhat.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>