Point taken.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 15 November 2017 at 17:47, John Marks <jmarks(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks to everyone who helped with the feature categorization effort on
the
> ovirt feature page.
>
> We've made significant progress, and thanks also to Eldan's UX work, the
> page is looking much better organized.
>
> There are a few simple things you can do to help keep the page organized,
> and to improve it.
>
> 1. Adding a new feature to
ovirt.org:
>
> Please add your feature to a suitable category:
> - Gluster (The location in the repository is:
> /develop/release-management/features/gluster)
> - Infra (Same pattern as above)
> - Integration
> - Metrics
> - Network
> - Node
> - SLA
> - Storage
> - UX
> - VDSM
> - Virt
I wonder where did this category division come from, some of these,
like "VDSM" or "Infra" or "SLA" may not be easy for users
to
understand.
We need to be careful about using internal development terms in user
facing documentation.
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. |
redhat.com/trusted
--
John Marks
Technical Writer, oVirt
redhat Israel
Cell: +972 52 8644 491