On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Vojtech Szocs <vszocs(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to me, it seems that with current CI flow, we can do following:
>
> - in build-artifacts.sh, build UI for English (only) & all supported
> browsers (IE10+, Firefox, Chrome), by using `ovirt_build_locales 0`
> as the default fallback
>
+1 from my side.
Sandro - any objections or thoughts?
No objections provided that for release we can fix it.
>
> Note: this will cut down the # of permutations from 3x9 to just 3
> (currently we have 3 supported browser types, 9 supported locales).
>
> - ensure that release builds still target all supported UI locales,
> by using `ovirt_build_locales 1` (override the default fallback)
>
You can make sure in the automation/ dir in the 'manual*' script has it.
>
> - it would be nice if the Jenkins job for build-artifacts.sh would
> set some `RELEASE=1` flag (or similar) when doing a release build
> (is this possible with current standard CI?)
>
In planning, what I want to do is to move the 'manual official' [1] to be
automatic official builds,
as for RELEASE flag, we'll need to discuss on changing how we manage
ovirt-engine versioning, I think we talked about 4.1 or later to try to use
mvn release plugin or
an alternate way to avoid the manual patches for updating POM files.
>
> Eyal/others, does above make sense?
>
Yea, see my comments.
>
> Also, as Nir mentioned, if `ovirt-engine` repo was configured with
> Submit Type == Fast Forward Only, we could drop RPM / GWT build in
> check-merged.sh (which was Eyal's original suggestion).
>
Its currently on 'Rebase if necessary', if there is an agreement I can
change it to 'Fast forward only'.
Fast forward only will require lot of manual rebase. That's the reason we
dropped it in the past
>
> Regards,
> Vojtech
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "Eyal Edri" <eedri(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>, "devel"
<devel(a)ovirt.org>,
> "Martin Perina" <mperina(a)redhat.com>, "Tal
> > Nisan" <tnisan(a)redhat.com>, "infra"
<infra(a)ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 5:38:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Dropping rpm build from ovirt-engine check-merged.sh
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Eyal Edri < eedri(a)redhat.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Sandro Bonazzola < sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Eyal Edri < eedri(a)redhat.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Sandro Bonazzola < sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Eyal Edri < eedri(a)redhat.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following [1] I'd like to propose to remove rpm building from the
> > 'check-merged.sh' script from ovirt-engine (master for now).
> >
> > The job [2] takes on avg 15 min while actually the rpms are built
> already in
> > check-patch
> > (with gwt draft mode if needed) and runs exactly the same build rpm
> command
> > as check-patch [3].
> >
> > So there isn't real value in running exactly the same rpm build post
> merge,
> > and we already build full permutation mode in 'build-artifacts.sh'.
> >
> > Any reason to keep it?
> > We can cut down valuable time in CI if we drop it and vacant more time
> for
> > more meaningful tests.
> >
> >
> > This depends on the flow: if we make check_merge gating to the merge
> and to
> > the build we should keep the rpm build becuase at merge a rebase is done
> > automatically.
> >
> > What do you mean by 'gating to the merge'? I'm not sure I
understand
> what it
> > means.
> > Isn't check-patch.sh does the gating? check-merge runs post merge so its
> > already too late to gate the code ...
> > And I think check-merge and check-patch currently runs the same rpmbuild
> > command, so I don't see how check-merged has any value over check-patch.
> >
> > when merge command is issued a rebase is done as well. We still need a
> > check-merged job because the code checked by check-patch is not the same
> > anymore when check-merged runs.
> >
> > OK, now I understand, so indeed check-merge can potentially run on
> different
> > code than check-patch and possibly fail due to it.
> >
> > If we require only fast-forward merges, there is no way to merge patch
> > before a rebase. Once you rebase a patch, check-patch runs...
> >
> > So check-merge may be unneeded in this case.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In original desing of stdci, check-merged was supposed to become a
> gating
> > test for build-artifacts.
> >
> > We have it in our backlog, i.e installing Zuul and adding gating for the
> > check-merged jobs, its mostly relevant for system jobs, but we can
> defiently
> > do it first for simple 'check-merged.sh' jobs
> > as part of standard CI.
> >
> > Opened a ticket for it [1]
> >
> > [1]
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-734
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If there's not gating process performed by check-merge then I agree in
> > dropping rpm build.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-416
> > [2]
> >
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_master_check-merge
> d-el7-x86_64/buildTimeTrend
> > [3]
> > rpmbuild \
> > -D "_rpmdir $PWD/output" \
> > -D "_topmdir $PWD/rpmbuild" \
> > -D "release_suffix ${SUFFIX}" \
> > -D "ovirt_build_ut $BUILD_UT" \
> > -D "ovirt_build_extra_flags $EXTRA_BUILD_FLAGS" \
> > -D "ovirt_build_draft 1" \
> > --rebuild output/*.src.rpm
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eyal Edri
> > Associate Manager
> > RHV DevOps
> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> > Red Hat Israel
> >
> > phone: +972-9-7692018
> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sandro Bonazzola
> > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
> collaboration.
> > See how it works at
redhat.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eyal Edri
> > Associate Manager
> > RHV DevOps
> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> > Red Hat Israel
> >
> > phone: +972-9-7692018
> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sandro Bonazzola
> > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
> collaboration.
> > See how it works at
redhat.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eyal Edri
> > Associate Manager
> > RHV DevOps
> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> > Red Hat Israel
> >
> > phone: +972-9-7692018
> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Infra mailing list
> > Infra(a)ovirt.org
> >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Infra mailing list
> > Infra(a)ovirt.org
> >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
> >
>
--
Eyal Edri
Associate Manager
RHV DevOps
EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Red Hat Israel
phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com
<
https://www.redhat.com/it/about/events/red-hat-open-source-day-2016>