Re: [ovirt-devel] Request for new git repos: ovirt-engine-sdk-python-specs, ovirt-engine-sdk-java-specs, ovirt-engine-cli-specs

--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/12, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: ode' used for building any official packages. build approach, and introduces a lot of complexity and limitations to the c= ontinuous integration of the project. t and what we have already in place for jasper-report-server or here too. The difference is that we control the source code, we are not doing any continuous integration of those projects, as we don't control the source reposiotries, if we did, it would be complicated to manage as it's split in two repos (one for the code and another for the specs). That makes it really hard to create a continuous deployment pipeline as you have to keep track for each source code commit, which commit of the spec file is the one that can build it. And we don't do that, so we can't build any point in th esource code, once a non-backwards compatible change is made to the spec all the previous code becomes obsolete. It also affects to the ability to keep a semantic versioning of the product, as you'll have to manage generating a version from multiple repositories (and keep the version<->hashes map and the ordering). As a change on the spec should be reflected on the version of the generated package. nd a more friendly solution? ji way of separating specs and sources is fine. The problem is in the continuos integration and build point of view. If you are not aiming to build countinuously it does not matte. > > > David Caro > > > On Jan 9, 2015 4:27 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> Il 09/01/2015 15:13, Juan Hern=E1ndez ha scritto: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Please create the following new git repIl 09/01/2015 15:13, Juan Hern= =E1ndez ha scritto: he > >> Java SDK, and the CLI. Each repository will have branches for each pair > >> of oVirt major release and supported distribution: > >> > > > Any reason for not having something like "ovirt-specs" > > with suggested branches: > > > >> ovirt-3.5-el6 > >> ovirt-3.5-el7 > >> ovirt-3.5-fc20 > >> ovirt-3.5-fc21 > >> ovirt-3.6-el6 > >> ... > > > > and having there > > > ovirt-engine-sdk-python/ovirt-engine-sdk-python.spec > > ovirt-engine-sdk-python/0001-your-friendly-patch.patch > > ovirt-engine-sdk-java/ovirt-engine-sdk-java.spec > > ovirt-engine-cli/ovirt-engine-cli.spec > > ... > > >> > >> Initially I will be the maintainer of these repositories. > >> > >> Once these repos are created the specs will be added to them and > >> eventually removed completely from the main repositories of the SDKs a= nd > >> the CLI. > >> > >> Thanks in advance, > >> Juan Hern=E1ndez > >> > > > --=20 > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com --=20 David Caro Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605 --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--