On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:42:32PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hey,
what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 host where you want to install vdsm onto?
Is vdsm taking care of it?
I'm asking this, because firewalld seems to be in the default package (please correct me if I am wrong) set of CentOS 7 and thus installed by default.
As far as I know, Vdsm runs fine in parallel to firewalld on recent el7.1 (there used to be problems in early 7.0 versions).
If this is not the case, please file a bug with precise versions!
Bug 1281417 - vdsm host can not be added with firewalld enabled
Would everything work all right if Vdsm's port (54321) is opened in firewalld? It seems that the host CAN be added, but remains in non-responsive mode due to the firewall being shut. right? Regards, Dan.