10:49 a.m.
Hi,
I made some changes [1][2] to ovirt-engine that make it now more
aggressively (and correctly) cache all static assets. We were previously
caching some things, but not all. (Thanks to ykaul for noticing.)
The upside is reduced server hits and faster page loads.
The downside is you'll have to clear your browser cache more often as you
are developing. (You can use a browser plugin, incognito mode, F12 >
disable cache, etc. if you don't want to keep opening the dialog.)
[1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83879/
[2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83871/
Best wishes,
Greg
--
GREG SHEREMETA
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER - TEAM LEAD - RHV UX
Red Hat NA
<https://www.redhat.com/>
gshereme(a)redhat.com IRC: gshereme
<https://red.ht/sig>
2:47 a.m.
The downside is you'll have to clear your browser cache more
often as you
are developing. (You can use a browser plugin, incognito mode, F12
disable cache, etc. if you don't want to keep opening the
dialog.)
Why don't we use the name-hash.ext format for static files? Recompile
creates a different filename (because hash changed) which is not cached.
That would take care of cache invalidation and it is a common pattern in
the CDN world.
Best regards
Martin Sivak
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made some changes [1][2] to ovirt-engine that make it now more
> aggressively (and correctly) cache all static assets. We were previously
> caching some things, but not all. (Thanks to ykaul for noticing.)
>
> The upside is reduced server hits and faster page loads.
>
The downside is you'll have to clear your browser cache more
often as you
> are developing. (You can use a browser plugin, incognito mode, F12
>
disable cache, etc. if you don't want to keep opening the
dialog.)
>
> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83879/
> [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83871/
>
> Best wishes,
> Greg
>
>
> --
>
> GREG SHEREMETA
>
> SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER - TEAM LEAD - RHV UX
>
> Red Hat NA
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> gshereme(a)redhat.com IRC: gshereme
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
6:28 a.m.
Hi Martin,
I think that's a great idea for an enhancement.
Best wishes,
Greg
On Nov 15, 2017 3:47 AM, "Martin Sivak" <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The downside is you'll have to clear your browser cache more
often as you
are developing. (You can use a browser plugin, incognito mode, F12
disable cache, etc. if you don't want to keep opening the
dialog.)
Why don't we use the name-hash.ext format for static files? Recompile
creates a different filename (because hash changed) which is not cached.
That would take care of cache invalidation and it is a common pattern in
the CDN world.
Best regards
Martin Sivak
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made some changes [1][2] to ovirt-engine that make it now more
> aggressively (and correctly) cache all static assets. We were previously
> caching some things, but not all. (Thanks to ykaul for noticing.)
>
> The upside is reduced server hits and faster page loads.
>
The downside is you'll have to clear your browser cache more
often as you
> are developing. (You can use a browser plugin, incognito mode, F12
>
disable cache, etc. if you don't want to keep opening the
dialog.)
>
> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83879/
> [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83871/
>
> Best wishes,
> Greg
>
>
> --
>
> GREG SHEREMETA
>
> SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER - TEAM LEAD - RHV UX
>
> Red Hat NA
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> gshereme(a)redhat.com IRC: gshereme
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
2348
days inactive
2349
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Greg Sheremeta -
Martin Sivak