3:43 a.m.
Hi,
I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute, it can be
FullVirtualized or ParaVirtualized. It appears the attribute does not play in any
decision, not sent to vdsm. Can it be removed or anyone need it?
thx,
Laszlo
3:57 a.m.
The same question applies to HypervisorType, since only KVM is supported.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 9:43:14 AM
Subject: [Engine-devel] operation mode
Hi,
I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute, it
can be FullVirtualized or ParaVirtualized. It appears the attribute
does not play in any decision, not sent to vdsm. Can it be removed
or anyone need it?
thx,
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
1:35 p.m.
On 11/01/2012 10:43 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute, it can be
FullVirtualized or ParaVirtuaized. It appears the attribute does not play in any decision,
not sent
to vdsm. Can it be removed or anyone need it?
wow, that's old...
iirc, back in 2007, some cases required to boot with qemu instead of kvm
(some real mode stuff (ghost?))
i think can be removed...
thx,
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
2:16 p.m.
On 11/01/2012 10:57 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
The same question applies to HypervisorType, since only KVM is
supported.
I think this one is worth a bit more thinking before removing actually,
but if you remove it in a single patch, easy enough to revert should we
want to add something like this back (and the enum is far from all that
needs to be done anyway for such a thing)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 9:43:14 AM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] operation mode
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute, it
> can be FullVirtualized or ParaVirtualized. It appears the attribute
> does not play in any decision, not sent to vdsm. Can it be removed
> or anyone need it?
>
> thx,
> Laszlo
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
4:07 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 7:35:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] operation mode
On 11/01/2012 10:43 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute, it
> can be FullVirtualized or ParaVirtuaized. It appears the attribute
> does not play in any decision, not sent
to vdsm. Can it be removed or anyone need it?
wow, that's old...
iirc, back in 2007, some cases required to boot with qemu instead of
kvm
(some real mode stuff (ghost?))
i think can be removed...
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/8986
>
> thx,
> Laszlo
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
4:13 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 8:16:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] operation mode
On 11/01/2012 10:57 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> The same question applies to HypervisorType, since only KVM is
> supported.
I think this one is worth a bit more thinking before removing
actually,
but if you remove it in a single patch, easy enough to revert should
we
want to add something like this back (and the enum is far from all
that
needs to be done anyway for such a thing)
Do you plan to support hypervisors other than qemu+kvm?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 9:43:14 AM
>> Subject: [Engine-devel] operation mode
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute,
>> it
>> can be FullVirtualized or ParaVirtualized. It appears the
>> attribute
>> does not play in any decision, not sent to vdsm. Can it be removed
>> or anyone need it?
>>
>> thx,
>> Laszlo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
4192
days inactive
4192
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Itamar Heim -
Laszlo Hornyak