CI: vdsm-standard-check-patch fails
Hi, CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console
This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve debugging from amazon side? On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE...
-- Eyal edri He / Him / His MANAGER CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION SYSTEM ENGINEERING Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, then on second one). Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when I push 30+ patches at the same time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve debugging from amazon side?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE...
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, then on second one). Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when I push 30+ patches at the same
Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is it also bad for reviewers, getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every rebase.
time the AWS connection issue arises constantly.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve debugging from amazon side?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE...
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV...
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, then on second one). Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when I push 30+ patches at the same
Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is it also bad for reviewers, getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every rebase.
Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push (without working on 30 different branches) ?
time the AWS connection issue arises constantly.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve debugging from amazon side?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE...
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV...
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, then on second one). Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when I push 30+ patches at the same
Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is it also bad for reviewers, getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every rebase.
Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push (without working on 30 different branches) ?
I don't know about such way. I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for reviews on one topic you can work on the other branches.
time the AWS connection issue arises constantly.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve debugging from amazon side?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE...
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV...
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, then on second one). Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when I push 30+ patches at the same
Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is it also bad for reviewers, getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every rebase.
Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push (without working on 30 different branches) ?
I don't know about such way.
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2]. [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for reviews on one topic you can work on the other branches.
time the AWS connection issue arises constantly.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve debugging from amazon side?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE...
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV...
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, then on second one). Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when I push 30+ patches at the same
Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is it also bad for reviewers, getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every rebase.
Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push (without working on 30 different branches) ?
I don't know about such way.
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2].
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be familiar with a similar solution.
[1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for reviews on one topic you can work on the other branches.
time the AWS connection issue arises constantly.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve debugging from amazon side?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit repository. > Example can be seen here: > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV...
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, then on second one). Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when I push 30+ patches at the same
Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is it also bad for reviewers, getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every rebase.
Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push (without working on 30 different branches) ?
I don't know about such way.
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push.
Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit plugin
(guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2].
Not clear how this will help. I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain. Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources. +Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be
familiar with a similar solution.
[1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for reviews on one topic you can work on the other branches.
time the AWS connection issue arises constantly.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS > and PHX which is still being investigated. > Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve > debugging from amazon side? > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >> repository. >> Example can be seen here: >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >> oVirt Code of Conduct: >> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >> List Archives: >> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >> > > > -- > > Eyal edri > > He / Him / His > > > MANAGER > > CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION > > SYSTEM ENGINEERING > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://red.ht/sig> > phone: +972-9-7692018 > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV...
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I > am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, > then on second one). > Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that when > I push 30+ patches at the same >
Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is it also bad for reviewers, getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every rebase.
Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push (without working on 30 different branches) ?
I don't know about such way.
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push.
Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit plugin
(guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2].
Not clear how this will help.
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
That could do as well.
Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be
familiar with a similar solution.
[1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for reviews on one topic you can work on the other branches.
> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: > >> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between AWS >> and PHX which is still being investigated. >> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >> debugging from amazon side? >> >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>> repository. >>> Example can be seen here: >>> >>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Eyal edri >> >> He / Him / His >> >> >> MANAGER >> >> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >> >> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >> >> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> phone: +972-9-7692018 >> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >> > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I >> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >> then on second one). >> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >> when I push 30+ patches at the same >> > > Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is > it also bad for reviewers, > getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every > rebase. >
Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push (without working on 30 different branches) ?
I don't know about such way.
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push.
Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like ci please test That will trigger a build of this patch.
Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit plugin
(guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2].
Not clear how this will help.
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
That could do as well.
Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be
familiar with a similar solution.
[1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for reviews on one topic you can work on the other branches.
> >> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >> >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>> debugging from amazon side? >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>> repository. >>>> Example can be seen here: >>>> >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>> List Archives: >>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Eyal edri >>> >>> He / Him / His >>> >>> >>> MANAGER >>> >>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>> >>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>> >>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >> oVirt Code of Conduct: >> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >> List Archives: >> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >> >
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I >>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >>> then on second one). >>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>> >> >> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >> it also bad for reviewers, >> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >> rebase. >> > > Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push > (without working on 30 different branches) ? >
I don't know about such way.
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push.
Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like
ci please test
That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed. The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit
plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2].
Not clear how this will help.
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
That could do as well.
Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be
familiar with a similar solution.
[1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for reviews on one topic you can work on the other branches.
> >> >>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>> repository. >>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>> >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>> List Archives: >>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Eyal edri >>>> >>>> He / Him / His >>>> >>>> >>>> MANAGER >>>> >>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>> >>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>> >>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >>> >>
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:18 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch >>>> I am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first >>>> try, then on second one). >>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>> >>> >>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >>> it also bad for reviewers, >>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >>> rebase. >>> >> >> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >> > > I don't know about such way. >
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push.
Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like
ci please test
That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed. The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
This is a bug in our CI infra that should be fix.
Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit
plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2].
Not clear how this will help.
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
That could do as well.
Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be
familiar with a similar solution.
[1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
> > I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for > reviews on one topic > you can work on the other branches. > > > >> >>> >>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>> repository. >>>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Eyal edri >>>>> >>>>> He / Him / His >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> MANAGER >>>>> >>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>> >>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>> >>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>> List Archives: >>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >>>> >>>
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I >>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >>>> then on second one). >>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>> >>> >>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >>> it also bad for reviewers, >>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >>> rebase. >>> >> >> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >> > > I don't know about such way. >
A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push.
Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like
ci please test
That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests. In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit
plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example skipping by a topic regex [2].
Not clear how this will help.
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
That could do as well.
Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be
familiar with a similar solution.
[1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
> > I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for > reviews on one topic > you can work on the other branches. > > > >> >>> >>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>> repository. >>>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Eyal edri >>>>> >>>>> He / Him / His >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> MANAGER >>>>> >>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>> >>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>> >>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>> List Archives: >>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >>>> >>>
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFGXY...
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per
>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >>>>> then on second one). >>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>>> >>>> >>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >>>> it also bad for reviewers, >>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >>>> rebase. >>>> >>> >>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >>> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >>> >> >> I don't know about such way. >> > > A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins > [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to
wrote: patch I prevent
> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. >
Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like
ci please test
That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on one of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/ the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI jobs running at the time.
The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit > plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for
example
> skipping by a topic regex [2]. >
Not clear how this will help.
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
That could do as well.
Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be
familiar with a similar solution.
> > [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip > [2] >
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
> > >> >> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for >> reviews on one topic >> you can work on the other branches. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>>> repository. >>>>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Eyal edri >>>>>> >>>>>> He / Him / His >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> MANAGER >>>>>> >>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>>> >>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>>> >>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>> List Archives: >>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >>>>> >>>>
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFGXY...
On 8/8/19 1:44 PM, Amit Bawer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com <mailto:mzamazal@redhat.com>> wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com <mailto:abawer@redhat.com>> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com>> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com <mailto:abawer@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com <mailto:abawer@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com <mailto:abawer@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com <mailto:abawer@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com <mailto:abawer@redhat.com>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I >>>>>>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >>>>>>>>>> then on second one). >>>>>>>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>>>>>>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >>>>>>>>> it also bad for reviewers, >>>>>>>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >>>>>>>>> rebase. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >>>>>>>> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know about such way. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins >>>>>> [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent >>>>>> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci >>>> should run or not? >>>> >>> >>> I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some >>> cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. >>> [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F >>> >> >> This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit >> like >> >> ci please test >> >> That will trigger a build of this patch. >> > > Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in > gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on one of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/ the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI jobs running at the time.
"ci build" runs only the "build-artifacts" stage. To affect the score (and run the tests as a matter of fact) you should use "ci test".
> The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well. > > >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit >>>>>> plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for example >>>>>> skipping by a topic regex [2]. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> Not clear how this will help. >>>> >>> >>> If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can >>> control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. >>> When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have >>> CI per push as usual. >>> >>> >>>> I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a >>>> changeset, same way we have in travis, >>>> and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. >>>> Every post to gerrit will trigger one >>>> build, instead of one build per patch in the chain. >>>> >>> >>> That could do as well. >>> >>> >>>> Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a >>>> later patch in the chain, which >>>> is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources. >>>> >>> >>> We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification >>> process. >>> >> >>> >>>> +Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com <mailto:amarchuk@redhat.com>> I have been told you might be >>>>> familiar with a similar solution. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip >>>>>> [2] >>>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for >>>>>>> reviews on one topic >>>>>>> you can work on the other branches. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com <mailto:eedri@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>>>>>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>>>>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>>>>>>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com <mailto:abawer@redhat.com>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>>>>>>>> repository. >>>>>>>>>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org <mailto:devel@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org <mailto:devel-leave@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Eyal edri >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He / Him / His >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> MANAGER >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org <mailto:devel@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org <mailto:devel-leave@ovirt.org> >>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org <mailto:devel@ovirt.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org <mailto:devel-leave@ovirt.org> > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFGXY...
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/ZUT3AJSGY5L67K...
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk@redhat.com> wrote:
On 8/8/19 1:44 PM, Amit Bawer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per
>>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >>>>>> then on second one). >>>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >>>>> it also bad for reviewers, >>>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >>>>> rebase. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >>>> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >>>> >>> >>> I don't know about such way. >>> >> >> A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins
wrote: patch I plugins
>> [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent >> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. >> > Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci should run or not?
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like
ci please test
That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on one of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/ the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI jobs running at the time.
"ci build" runs only the "build-artifacts" stage. To affect the score (and run the tests as a matter of fact) you should use "ci test".
Thanks for the clarification, good to know. So that only leaves the "how do disable automated CI upon gerrit push" issue.
The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
> Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit >> plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for
example
>> skipping by a topic regex [2]. >> > Not clear how this will help.
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a changeset, same way we have in travis, and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. Every post to gerrit will trigger one build, instead of one build per patch in the chain.
That could do as well.
Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a later patch in the chain, which is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources.
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might
be
> familiar with a similar solution. > >> >> [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip >> [2] >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr... >> >> >>> >>> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for >>> reviews on one topic >>> you can work on the other branches. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>>>> repository. >>>>>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Eyal edri >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He / Him / His >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MANAGER >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >>>>>> >>>>>
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFGXY...
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/ZUT3AJSGY5L67K...
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk@redhat.com> wrote:
On 8/8/19 1:44 PM, Amit Bawer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per
>>>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >>>>>>> then on second one). >>>>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>>>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >>>>>> it also bad for reviewers, >>>>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >>>>>> rebase. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >>>>> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't know about such way. >>>> >>> >>> A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins
wrote: patch I plugins
>>> [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent >>> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. >>> >> > Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci > should run or not? >
I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like
ci please test
That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on one of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/ the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI jobs running at the time.
"ci build" runs only the "build-artifacts" stage. To affect the score (and run the tests as a matter of fact) you should use "ci test".
Thanks for the clarification, good to know. So that only leaves the "how do disable automated CI upon gerrit push" issue.
One solution of the problem might be to have smaller batches of unmerged patches. If we could review and merge patches faster, it would be less burden for everybody, including CI infrastructure.
The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
> >> Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit >>> plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for
example
>>> skipping by a topic regex [2]. >>> >> > Not clear how this will help. >
If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have CI per push as usual.
> I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a > changeset, same way we have in travis, > and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. > Every post to gerrit will trigger one > build, instead of one build per patch in the chain. >
That could do as well.
> Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a > later patch in the chain, which > is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources. >
We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification process.
> +Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might
be
>> familiar with a similar solution. >> >>> >>> [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip >>> [2] >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for >>>> reviews on one topic >>>> you can work on the other branches. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>>>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>>>>> repository. >>>>>>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eyal edri >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He / Him / His >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MANAGER >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV... >>>>>>> >>>>>>
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFGXY...
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/ZUT3AJSGY5L67K...
its not always applicable. for example like in poc where we need to get same branch working in different envs and not wanting to deal with lots of cherry-picks from different branches. On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:16 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk@redhat.com> wrote:
On 8/8/19 1:44 PM, Amit Bawer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com
>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer < abawer@redhat.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per patch I >>>>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if not on first try, >>>>>>>> then on second one). >>>>>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed that >>>>>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds, and is >>>>>>> it also bad for reviewers, >>>>>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for every >>>>>>> rebase. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >>>>>> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't know about such way. >>>>> >>>> >>>> A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins plugins >>>> [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit messages to prevent >>>> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. >>>> >>> >> Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to decide if ci >> should run or not? >> > > I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI in some > cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right [3]. > [3] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F >
This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to gerrit like
ci please test
That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on one of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/ the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI jobs running at the time.
"ci build" runs only the "build-artifacts" stage. To affect the score (and run the tests as a matter of fact) you should use "ci test".
Thanks for the clarification, good to know. So that only leaves the "how do disable automated CI upon gerrit push" issue.
One solution of the problem might be to have smaller batches of unmerged patches. If we could review and merge patches faster, it would be less burden for everybody, including CI infrastructure.
The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
> > >> >>> Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing gerrit >>>> plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), for
example
>>>> skipping by a topic regex [2]. >>>> >>> >> Not clear how this will help. >> > > If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" I can > control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. > When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature" and have > CI per push as usual. > > >> I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in a >> changeset, same way we have in travis, >> and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists work. >> Every post to gerrit will trigger one >> build, instead of one build per patch in the chain. >> > > That could do as well. > > >> Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed by a >> later patch in the chain, which >> is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted resources. >> > > We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the verification > process. >
> >> +Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you might be >>> familiar with a similar solution. >>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip >>>> [2] >>>>
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-tr...
>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you wait for >>>>> reviews on one topic >>>>> you can work on the other branches. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue between >>>>>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we involve >>>>>>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer < abawer@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>>>>>> repository. >>>>>>>>>> Example can be seen here: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQNWE...
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Eyal edri >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He / Him / His >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> MANAGER >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org >>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DPUV...
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFGXY...
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/ZUT3AJSGY5L67K...
On čtvrtek 8. srpna 2019 14:57:12 CEST Amit Bawer wrote:
its not always applicable. for example like in poc where we need to get same branch working in different envs and not wanting to deal with lots of cherry-picks from different branches.
as a workaround you can run tests in Travis which runs tests only for the latest commit. The flow can be (and I use it) - submit smaller batch of patches which are ready into gerrit and poke people to review them and merge, in meantime work on your current branch and push changes for testing into Travis.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:16 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk@redhat.com>
wrote:
On 8/8/19 1:44 PM, Amit Bawer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <
abawer@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI per
patch I
>>>>>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if >>>>>>>>> not
on first try,
>>>>>>>>> then on second one). >>>>>>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have noticed
that
>>>>>>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds,
and
is
>>>>>>>> it also bad for reviewers, >>>>>>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for
every
>>>>>>>> rebase. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit push >>>>>>> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know about such way. >>>>> >>>>> A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins
plugins
>>>>> [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit >>>>> messages
to prevent
>>>>> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. >>> >>> Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to >>> decide
if ci
>>> should run or not? >> >> I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI >> in
some
>> cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right >> [3]. >> [3]
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
> This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to
gerrit
> like > > ci please test > > That will trigger a build of this patch.
Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on
one
of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/ the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI jobs running at the time.
"ci build" runs only the "build-artifacts" stage. To affect the score
(and
run the tests as a matter of fact) you should use "ci test".
Thanks for the clarification, good to know. So that only leaves the "how do disable automated CI upon gerrit push" issue.
One solution of the problem might be to have smaller batches of unmerged patches. If we could review and merge patches faster, it would be less burden for everybody, including CI infrastructure.
The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well.
>>>> Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing >>>> gerrit >>>> >>>>> plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), >>>>> for
example
>>>>> skipping by a topic regex [2]. >>> >>> Not clear how this will help. >> >> If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" >> I
can
>> control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. >> When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature"
and
have
>> CI per push as usual. >> >>> I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in >>> a >>> changeset, same way we have in travis, >>> and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists
work.
>>> Every post to gerrit will trigger one >>> build, instead of one build per patch in the chain. >> >> That could do as well. >> >>> Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed
by a
>>> later patch in the chain, which >>> is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted
resources.
>> We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the
verification
>> process. >> >>> +Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you
might
be
>>>> familiar with a similar solution. >>>> >>>>> [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip >>>>> [2]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-> > trigger-to-ignore-my-ci-users-commits>
>>>>>> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you >>>>>> wait
for
>>>>>> reviews on one topic >>>>>> you can work on the other branches. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue
between
>>>>>>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>>>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we
involve
>>>>>>>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <
abawer@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>>>>>>> repository.
>>>>>>>>>>> Example can be seen here: https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>>>>>>> List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQN WEMD2JQ6WARHJRDTYCPI/> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Eyal edri >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> He / Him / His >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> MANAGER >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>>>>> List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DP UVGUFUNHF2ZALB5I4JPZ/> _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFG XYB4SJM74WTCI3J2UBRQ/>
Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/ZUT3AJSGY5L6 7KGZ5G2JRVIFJHMG6K37/
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:44 PM Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek@redhat.com> wrote:
On čtvrtek 8. srpna 2019 14:57:12 CEST Amit Bawer wrote:
its not always applicable. for example like in poc where we need to get same branch working in different envs and not wanting to deal with lots of cherry-picks from different branches.
as a workaround you can run tests in Travis which runs tests only for the latest commit.
This means fork github's vdsm?
The flow can be (and I use it) - submit smaller batch of patches which are ready
Seems that I would still have to break a side branch into smaller branches for gerrit topics sake. And if there are review fixes, i'll have to make sure that both copies are in sync.
into gerrit and poke people to review them and merge,
In practice I have a single approver, so patches could be waiting for a while.
in meantime work on your current branch and push changes for testing into Travis.
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk@redhat.com>
wrote:
On 8/8/19 1:44 PM, Amit Bawer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
wrote:
Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:06 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Amit Bawer <abawer@redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Bawer < abawer@redhat.com>
wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nir Soffer < nsoffer@redhat.com>
wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:01 PM Amit Bawer < abawer@redhat.com>
wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 PM Nir Soffer < nsoffer@redhat.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:27 AM Amit Bawer <
abawer@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I have seen some improvement: when I re-trigger the CI
patch I
>>>>>>>>>> am able to pass or get the actual test errors if any (if >>>>>>>>>> not
on first try,
>>>>>>>>>> then on second one). >>>>>>>>>> Probably not a very useful information, but I have
noticed
that
>>>>>>>>>> when I push 30+ patches at the same >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do not do that, jenkins cannot handle 30 concurrent builds,
and
is
>>>>>>>>> it also bad for reviewers, >>>>>>>>> getting several mails about every patch in your chain, for
every
>>>>>>>>> rebase. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there is a way to prevent CI from running per gerrit
>>>>>>>> (without working on 30 different branches) ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know about such way. >>>>>> >>>>>> A legit option could be adding the Skip CI plugin to jenkins
plugins
>>>>>> [1]; with that devs can add "[skip ci]" to their commit >>>>>> messages
to prevent
>>>>>> jenkins from automatically launching CI upon push. >>>> >>>> Do you want to modify the commit message for every patch to >>>> decide
if ci
>>>> should run or not? >>> >>> I think that having the option to knowingly disable automated CI >>> in
some
>>> cases is useful. We could always re-trigger when time is right >>> [3]. >>> [3]
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/login?from=%2Fgerrit_manual_trigger%2F
>> This is too much work, but I think today we can add a comment to
gerrit
>> like >> >> ci please test >> >> That will trigger a build of this patch. > > Indeed, but it leaves the "Continuous-Integration" mark untouched in > gerrit, giving the wrong impression this patch is still CI failed.
No, it updates CI score. I use it routinely with falsely failed tests.
In my experience, CI score may not get updated if there are concurrent builds, such as when you upload a new version of a patch while CI is still running on the previous version.
I may have missed something, but i tried "ci build" gerrit comment on
one
of the CI failed patches https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/101357/ the CI build passed, but CI indicator is still -1. AFAICT I had no other CI jobs running at the time.
"ci build" runs only the "build-artifacts" stage. To affect the score
(and
run the tests as a matter of fact) you should use "ci test".
Thanks for the clarification, good to know. So that only leaves the "how do disable automated CI upon gerrit
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:16 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote: per push push"
issue.
One solution of the problem might be to have smaller batches of unmerged patches. If we could review and merge patches faster, it would be less burden for everybody, including CI infrastructure.
> The re-trigger UI takes care for that as well. > >>>>> Another option is to emulate the behaviour in the existing >>>>> gerrit >>>>> >>>>>> plugin (guess there is already such one in ovirt's jenkins), >>>>>> for
example
>>>>>> skipping by a topic regex [2]. >>>> >>>> Not clear how this will help. >>> >>> If I make a gerrit topic with some name like "my_feature_skip_ci" >>> I
can
>>> control whether I want to have automated CI for its patches. >>> When I want to go back to normal I can rename it to "my_feature"
and
have
>>> CI per push as usual. >>> >>>> I think a possible solution can be running only the top patch in >>>> a >>>> changeset, same way we have in travis, >>>> and the same way systems that grab patches from mailing lists
work.
>>>> Every post to gerrit will trigger one >>>> build, instead of one build per patch in the chain. >>> >>> That could do as well. >>> >>>> Of course this will allow merging broken patches that are fixed
by a
>>>> later patch in the chain, which >>>> is also not ideal, but it is better given our restricted
resources.
>>> We can re-trigger CI manually in this case as part of the
verification
>>> process. >>> >>>> +Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> I have been told you
might
be
>>>>> familiar with a similar solution. >>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://plugins.jenkins.io/ci-skip >>>>>> [2]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37807941/how-can-i-get-jenkins-gerrit-> trigger-to-ignore-my-ci-users-commits>
>>>>>>> I'm using keeping several small active branches. While you >>>>>>> wait
for
>>>>>>> reviews on one topic >>>>>>> you can work on the other branches. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> time the AWS connection issue arises constantly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Eyal Edri < eedri@redhat.com>
wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> This was reported already and AFAIK its a network issue
between
>>>>>>>>>>> AWS and PHX which is still being investigated. >>>>>>>>>>> Evgheni, any insights or update on the issue? should we
involve
>>>>>>>>>>> debugging from amazon side? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Amit Bawer <
abawer@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> CI seems to fail constantly for unavailable remote gerrit >>>>>>>>>>>> repository.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Example can be seen here:
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_standard-check-patch/9415/console
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>>>>>> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/AHPHUZAABAQN
WEMD2JQ6WARHJRDTYCPI/>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Eyal edri >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He / Him / His >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> MANAGER >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> SYSTEM ENGINEERING >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>>>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>>>>>>>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>>>>>> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/W6DUMIUSN5DP
UVGUFUNHF2ZALB5I4JPZ/>
> _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/MMXGDBHHLMFG
XYB4SJM74WTCI3J2UBRQ/>
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/ZUT3AJSGY5L6
7KGZ5G2JRVIFJHMG6K37/
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/P3AGRBYGUDENDY...
participants (6)
-
Amit Bawer -
Eyal Edri -
Marcin Sobczyk -
Milan Zamazal -
Nir Soffer -
Vojtech Juranek