11:35 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060906010904020105000601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
This is regarding the following validation method we have in
ValidationUtils:
/public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase> ArrayList<String>
validateInputs(List<Class<?>> validationGroupList, T parameters);/
I there any particular reason for supporting the validations only on
objects of classes derived from VdcActionParametersBase? I guess this
was done because this method is primarily intended to validate the
action parameters passed to a BLL action, using the validation
annotations on the parameter class. However I think this method can be
useful for general use as well. e.g. I cannot add a "@Valid" annotation
on a "list" or a "map" in a parameter class. So I need to iterate over
the list/map, and validate each element inside the loop. The validation
inside the loop can also utilize the above method if the restriction
"extends VdcActionParametersBase" is removed. This will allow me to do
the following in the canDoAction method:
protected boolean canDoAction() {
...
for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {
List<String> errors =
ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(), brick);
if(errors != null) {
for(String error : errors) {
addCanDoActionMessage(error);
}
}
}
...
}
Regards,
Shireesh
--------------060906010904020105000601
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
This is regarding the following validation method we have in
ValidationUtils:<br>
<br>
<i>public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase>
ArrayList<String>
validateInputs(List<Class<?>>
validationGroupList, T parameters);</i><br>
<br>
I there any particular reason for supporting the validations only on
objects of classes derived from VdcActionParametersBase? I guess
this was done because this method is primarily intended to validate
the action parameters passed to a BLL action, using the validation
annotations on the parameter class. However I think this method can
be useful for general use as well. e.g. I cannot add a "@Valid"
annotation on a "list" or a "map" in a parameter class. So I need
to
iterate over the list/map, and validate each element inside the
loop. The validation inside the loop can also utilize the above
method if the restriction "extends VdcActionParametersBase" is
removed. This will allow me to do the following in the canDoAction
method:<br>
<br>
protected boolean canDoAction() {<br>
...<br>
for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {<br>
List<String> errors =
ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(), brick);<br>
if(errors != null)
{<br>
for(String error : errors) {<br>
addCanDoActionMessage(error);<br>
}<br>
}<br>
}<br>
...<br>
}<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Shireesh<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------060906010904020105000601--
12:50 a.m.
--=_e21defe9-d4a0-4579-ac6e-9f383c6664d2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shireesh Anjal" <sanjal(a)redhat.com>
To: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:35:25 AM
Subject: [Engine-devel] Query regarding
ValidationUtils#validateInputs
Hi,
This is regarding the following validation method we have in
ValidationUtils:
public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase>
ArrayList<String>
validateInputs(List<Class<?>> validationGroupList, T parameters);
I there any particular reason for supporting the validations only on
objects of classes derived from VdcActionParametersBase? I guess
this was done because this method is primarily intended to validate
the action parameters passed to a BLL action, using the validation
annotations on the parameter class. However I think this method can
be useful for general use as well. e.g. I cannot add a "@Valid"
annotation on a "list" or a "map" in a parameter class. So I need to
iterate over the list/map, and validate each element inside the
loop. The validation inside the loop can also utilize the above
method if the restriction "extends VdcActionParametersBase" is
removed. This will allow me to do the following in the canDoAction
method:
protected boolean canDoAction() {
...
for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {
List<String> errors =
ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(), brick);
if(errors != null) {
for(String error : errors) {
addCanDoActionMessage(error);
}
}
}
...
}
Regards,
Shireesh
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
i don't think there is a reason to restrict only for VdcActionParametersBase, roy what
do you think?
also you can use here
getReturnValue().getCanDoActionMessages().addAll(errors);
instead of going over on all errors.
--=_e21defe9-d4a0-4579-ac6e-9f383c6664d2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0;
}</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Times New Roman;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'><br><br><hr
id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16, 16,
255);margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From:
</b>"Shireesh Anjal"
&lt;sanjal(a)redhat.com&gt;<br><b>To:
</b>engine-devel(a)ovirt.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, April 12,
2012 9:35:25 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>[Engine-devel] Query regarding
ValidationUtils#validateInputs<br><br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
This is regarding the following validation method we have in
ValidationUtils:<br>
<br>
<i>public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase>
ArrayList<String>
validateInputs(List<Class<?>>
validationGroupList, T parameters);</i><br>
<br>
I there any particular reason for supporting the validations only on
objects of classes derived from VdcActionParametersBase? I guess
this was done because this method is primarily intended to validate
the action parameters passed to a BLL action, using the validation
annotations on the parameter class. However I think this method can
be useful for general use as well. e.g. I cannot add a "@Valid"
annotation on a "list" or a "map" in a parameter class. So I need
to
iterate over the list/map, and validate each element inside the
loop. The validation inside the loop can also utilize the above
method if the restriction "extends VdcActionParametersBase" is
removed. This will allow me to do the following in the canDoAction
method:<br>
<br>
protected boolean canDoAction() {<br>
...<br>
for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {<br>
List<String> errors =
ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(), brick);<br>
if(errors != null)
{<br>
for(String error : errors) {<br>
addCanDoActionMessage(error);<br>
}<br>
}<br>
}<br>
...<br>
}<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Shireesh<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>Engine-devel mailing
list<br>Engine-devel@ovirt.org<br>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel<br></blockquote>i
don't think there is a reason to restrict only for VdcActionParametersBase, roy what
do you think?<br><br>also you can use
here<br>getReturnValue().getCanDoActionMessages().addAll(errors);<br>instead
of going over on all errors.<br></div></body></html>
--=_e21defe9-d4a0-4579-ac6e-9f383c6664d2--
11:01 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080707050808080009010909
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/12/2012 10:50 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Shireesh Anjal" <sanjal(a)redhat.com>
*To: *engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
*Sent: *Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:35:25 AM
*Subject: *[Engine-devel] Query regarding
ValidationUtils#validateInputs
Hi,
This is regarding the following validation method we have in
ValidationUtils:
/public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase>
ArrayList<String> validateInputs(List<Class<?>>
validationGroupList, T parameters);/
I there any particular reason for supporting the validations only
on objects of classes derived from VdcActionParametersBase? I
guess this was done because this method is primarily intended to
validate the action parameters passed to a BLL action, using the
validation annotations on the parameter class. However I think
this method can be useful for general use as well. e.g. I cannot
add a "@Valid" annotation on a "list" or a "map" in a
parameter
class. So I need to iterate over the list/map, and validate each
element inside the loop. The validation inside the loop can also
utilize the above method if the restriction "extends
VdcActionParametersBase" is removed. This will allow me to do the
following in the canDoAction method:
protected boolean canDoAction() {
...
for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {
List<String> errors =
ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(), brick);
if(errors != null) {
for(String error : errors) {
addCanDoActionMessage(error);
}
}
}
...
}
Regards,
Shireesh
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
i don't think there is a reason to restrict only for
VdcActionParametersBase, roy what do you think?
also you can use here
getReturnValue().getCanDoActionMessages().addAll(errors);
instead of going over on all errors.
pls see SetupNetworksParameters.java for validating a list of network
interfaces.
hibernate validator supports trivial object graphs and members that are
arrays, list and java.util.map implementations.
If your code looks like that it should work. If you are using special
validation groups please add them to your command with addValidationGroups.
this should work:
GlusterCommandParameters.java
@Valid
List<Bricks> bricks
Bricks.java
@NotNull
Guid id
--------------080707050808080009010909
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
On 04/12/2012 10:50 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:15a5329c-4579-4ef6-b1c8-be0b260e859b@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css">p { margin: 0; }</style>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color:
#000000"><br>
<br>
<hr id="zwchr">
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16, 16,
255);margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From:
</b>"Shireesh Anjal" <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:sanjal@redhat.com"><sanjal@redhat.com></a><br>
<b>To: </b><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:engine-devel@ovirt.org">engine-devel@ovirt.org</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:35:25 AM<br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Engine-devel] Query regarding
ValidationUtils#validateInputs<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
This is regarding the following validation method we have in
ValidationUtils:<br>
<br>
<i>public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase>
ArrayList<String>
validateInputs(List<Class<?>>
validationGroupList, T parameters);</i><br>
<br>
I there any particular reason for supporting the validations
only on objects of classes derived from
VdcActionParametersBase? I guess this was done because this
method is primarily intended to validate the action parameters
passed to a BLL action, using the validation annotations on
the parameter class. However I think this method can be useful
for general use as well. e.g. I cannot add a "@Valid"
annotation on a "list" or a "map" in a parameter class. So
I
need to iterate over the list/map, and validate each element
inside the loop. The validation inside the loop can also
utilize the above method if the restriction "extends
VdcActionParametersBase" is removed. This will allow me to do
the following in the canDoAction method:<br>
<br>
protected boolean canDoAction() {<br>
...<br>
for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {<br>
List<String> errors =
ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(), brick);<br>
if(errors != null) {<br>
for(String error : errors) {<br>
addCanDoActionMessage(error);<br>
}<br>
}<br>
}<br>
...<br>
}<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Shireesh<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Engine-devel mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Engine-devel@ovirt.org">Engine-devel@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel">...
</blockquote>
i don't think there is a reason to restrict only for
VdcActionParametersBase, roy what do you think?<br>
<br>
also you can use here<br>
getReturnValue().getCanDoActionMessages().addAll(errors);<br>
instead of going over on all errors.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
pls see SetupNetworksParameters.java for validating a list of
network interfaces.<br>
<br>
hibernate validator supports trivial object graphs and members that
are arrays, list and java.util.map implementations.<br>
If your code looks like that it should work. If you are using
special validation groups please add them to your command with
addValidationGroups.<br>
<br>
this should work:<br>
<br>
GlusterCommandParameters.java<br>
@Valid<br>
List<Bricks> bricks<br>
<br>
Bricks.java<br>
@NotNull<br>
Guid id<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------080707050808080009010909--
1:59 a.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000503030108060803000801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sunday 15 April 2012 11:31 AM, Roy Golan wrote:
On 04/12/2012 10:50 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Shireesh Anjal" <sanjal(a)redhat.com>
> *To: *engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:35:25 AM
> *Subject: *[Engine-devel] Query regarding
> ValidationUtils#validateInputs
>
> Hi,
>
> This is regarding the following validation method we have in
> ValidationUtils:
>
> /public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase>
> ArrayList<String> validateInputs(List<Class<?>>
> validationGroupList, T parameters);/
>
> I there any particular reason for supporting the validations only
> on objects of classes derived from VdcActionParametersBase? I
> guess this was done because this method is primarily intended to
> validate the action parameters passed to a BLL action, using the
> validation annotations on the parameter class. However I think
> this method can be useful for general use as well. e.g. I cannot
> add a "@Valid" annotation on a "list" or a "map" in
a parameter
> class. So I need to iterate over the list/map, and validate each
> element inside the loop. The validation inside the loop can also
> utilize the above method if the restriction "extends
> VdcActionParametersBase" is removed. This will allow me to do the
> following in the canDoAction method:
>
> protected boolean canDoAction() {
> ...
> for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
> getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {
> List<String> errors =
> ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(), brick);
> if(errors != null) {
> for(String error : errors) {
> addCanDoActionMessage(error);
> }
> }
> }
> ...
> }
>
> Regards,
> Shireesh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
> i don't think there is a reason to restrict only for
> VdcActionParametersBase, roy what do you think?
>
> also you can use here
> getReturnValue().getCanDoActionMessages().addAll(errors);
> instead of going over on all errors.
pls see SetupNetworksParameters.java for validating a list of network
interfaces.
hibernate validator supports trivial object graphs and members that
are arrays, list and java.util.map implementations.
If your code looks like that it should work. If you are using special
validation groups please add them to your command with
addValidationGroups.
this should work:
GlusterCommandParameters.java
@Valid
List<Bricks> bricks
Bricks.java
@NotNull
Guid id
Thanks! I had tried adding @Valid annotation as suggested above, which
had resulted in an exception from the validation engine, without any
specific information about the problem, and I assumed that @Valid may
not work on Lists. Digged deeper after reading your response, and found
that the @Valid annotation resulted in a call to equals method on the
entity, which had a bug, resulting in the exception. It all works well
after fixing the bug.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
--------------000503030108060803000801
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On Sunday 15 April 2012 11:31 AM, Roy Golan wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4F8A643C.8060605@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
On 04/12/2012 10:50 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:15a5329c-4579-4ef6-b1c8-be0b260e859b@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css">p { margin: 0; }</style>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;
color: #000000"><br>
<br>
<hr id="zwchr">
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16, 16,
255);margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From:
</b>"Shireesh Anjal" <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:sanjal@redhat.com"><sanjal@redhat.com></a><br>
<b>To: </b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:engine-devel@ovirt.org">engine-devel@ovirt.org</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:35:25 AM<br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Engine-devel] Query regarding
ValidationUtils#validateInputs<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
This is regarding the following validation method we have in
ValidationUtils:<br>
<br>
<i>public static <T extends VdcActionParametersBase>
ArrayList<String>
validateInputs(List<Class<?>>
validationGroupList, T parameters);</i><br>
<br>
I there any particular reason for supporting the validations
only on objects of classes derived from
VdcActionParametersBase? I guess this was done because this
method is primarily intended to validate the action
parameters passed to a BLL action, using the validation
annotations on the parameter class. However I think this
method can be useful for general use as well. e.g. I cannot
add a "@Valid" annotation on a "list" or a "map"
in a
parameter class. So I need to iterate over the list/map, and
validate each element inside the loop. The validation inside
the loop can also utilize the above method if the
restriction "extends VdcActionParametersBase" is removed.
This will allow me to do the following in the canDoAction
method:<br>
<br>
protected boolean canDoAction() {<br>
...<br>
for(GlusterBrickEntity brick :
getParameters().getGlusterVolume().getBricks()) {<br>
List<String> errors =
ValidationUtils.validateInputs(getValidationGroups(),
brick);<br>
if(errors !=
null) {<br>
for(String error : errors) {<br>
addCanDoActionMessage(error);<br>
}<br>
}<br>
}<br>
...<br>
}<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Shireesh<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Engine-devel mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Engine-devel@ovirt.org">Engine-devel@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel">...
</blockquote>
i don't think there is a reason to restrict only for
VdcActionParametersBase, roy what do you think?<br>
<br>
also you can use here<br>
getReturnValue().getCanDoActionMessages().addAll(errors);<br>
instead of going over on all errors.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
pls see SetupNetworksParameters.java for validating a list of
network interfaces.<br>
<br>
hibernate validator supports trivial object graphs and members
that are arrays, list and java.util.map implementations.<br>
If your code looks like that it should work. If you are using
special validation groups please add them to your command with
addValidationGroups.<br>
<br>
this should work:<br>
<br>
GlusterCommandParameters.java<br>
@Valid<br>
List<Bricks> bricks<br>
<br>
Bricks.java<br>
@NotNull<br>
Guid id<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thanks! I had tried adding @Valid annotation as suggested above,
which had resulted in an exception from the validation engine,
without any specific information about the problem, and I assumed
that @Valid may not work on Lists. Digged deeper after reading your
response, and found that the @Valid annotation resulted in a call to
equals method on the entity, which had a bug, resulting in the
exception. It all works well after fixing the bug.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4F8A643C.8060605@redhat.com"
type="cite"> <br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Engine-devel@ovirt.org">Engine-devel@ovirt.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel">...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000503030108060803000801--
4392
days inactive
4397
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Omer Frenkel -
Roy Golan -
Shireesh Anjal