[ACTION REQUIRED] VDSM Broken dependencies on master
*Hi:* *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch from check-custom-el7 *06:37:41* unresolved deps: *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=... Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
*Hi:*
*06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch from check-custom-el7
*06:37:41* unresolved deps:
*06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=...
Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently. Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test. However, can we instead add https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job? https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job. Dan.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
*Hi:*
*06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch from check-custom-el7
*06:37:41* unresolved deps:
*06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=...
Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
However, can we instead add https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job?
Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
Dan.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
Hello, I tried https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7... but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it. However, openstack-kilo is ok. Petr 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
*Hi:*
*06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch from check-custom-el7
*06:37:41* unresolved deps:
*06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=...
Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
However, can we instead add https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job?
Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
Dan.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
I tried https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7... but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
However, openstack-kilo is ok.
Just another question, is it ok if I add a http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ instead? it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there. This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS Virt SIG oVirt releases.
Petr
2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
*Hi:*
*06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch from check-custom-el7
*06:37:41* unresolved deps:
*06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=...
Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
However, can we instead add
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job?
Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
Dan.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me. Petr 2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
I tried https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7... but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
However, openstack-kilo is ok.
Just another question, is it ok if I add a http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ instead? it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there.
This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS Virt SIG oVirt releases.
Petr
2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
*Hi:*
*06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch from check-custom-el7
*06:37:41* unresolved deps:
*06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=...
Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
However, can we instead add
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job?
Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
Dan.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me.
please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0. this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not used.
Petr
2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
I tried https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7... but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
However, openstack-kilo is ok.
Just another question, is it ok if I add a
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ instead? it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there.
This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS Virt SIG oVirt releases.
Petr
2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
*Hi:*
*06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch from check-custom-el7
*06:37:41* unresolved deps:
*06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=...
Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
However, can we instead add
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job?
Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
Dan.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
Why is that? In vdsm.spec.in is 'Requires: openvswitch >= 2'. Should i change it to 2.0? Petr 2015-09-18 14:59 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me.
please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0. this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not used.
Petr
2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
I tried https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7... but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
However, openstack-kilo is ok.
Just another question, is it ok if I add a
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ instead? it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there.
This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS Virt SIG oVirt releases.
Petr
2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > *Hi:* > > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch > from check-custom-el7 > > *06:37:41* unresolved deps: > > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 > > > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=... > > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
However, can we instead add
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job?
Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
Dan.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Why is that? In vdsm.spec.in is 'Requires: openvswitch >= 2'. Should i change it to 2.0?
2.0.0 better.
Petr
2015-09-18 14:59 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me.
please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0. this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not used.
Petr
2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
I tried https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7... but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
However, openstack-kilo is ok.
Just another question, is it ok if I add a
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ instead? it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there.
This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS Virt SIG oVirt releases.
Petr
2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > *Hi:* > > > > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch > > from check-custom-el7 > > > > *06:37:41* unresolved deps: > > > > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 > > > > > > > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=... > > > > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP. > > Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently. > > Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is > still > rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test. > > However, can we instead add > > https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ > to the repos available to this job? > > Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 > attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job. > > Dan. >
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
participants (3)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Petr Horacek -
Sandro Bonazzola