On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > *Hi:* > > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch > from check-custom-el7 > > *06:37:41* unresolved deps: > > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 > > > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTI... > > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP. Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently. Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test. However, can we instead add https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ to the repos available to this job?

https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job. Dan.

Hello, I tried https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/... but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it. However, openstack-kilo is ok.

Petr 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> > *Hi:* >> > >> > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch >> > from check-custom-el7 >> > >> > *06:37:41* unresolved deps: >> > >> > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 >> > >> > >> > >> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTI... >> > >> > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP. >> >> Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently. >> >> Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still >> rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test. >> >> However, can we instead add >> >> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ >> to the repos available to this job? >> >> > Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty? > > > >> >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 >> attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job. >> >> Dan. >> > > > > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com >

Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me.

Petr 2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I tried >> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/... >> but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it. >> >> However, openstack-kilo is ok. >> > > Just another question, is it ok if I add a > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ > instead? > it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm > <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/open... > I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there. > > This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS > Virt SIG oVirt releases. > > > > >> >> >> Petr >> >> >> >> 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >>>> > *Hi:* >>>> > >>>> > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch >>>> > from check-custom-el7 >>>> > >>>> > *06:37:41* unresolved deps: >>>> > >>>> > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTI... >>>> > >>>> > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP. >>>> >>>> Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently. >>>> >>>> Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still >>>> rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test. >>>> >>>> However, can we instead add >>>> >>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ >>>> to the repos available to this job? >>>> >>>> >>> Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty? >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 >>>> attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job. >>>> >>>> Dan. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sandro Bonazzola >>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community >>> collaboration. >>> See how it works at redhat.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com >

Why is that? In vdsm.spec.in is 'Requires: openvswitch >= 2'. Should i change it to 2.0?

Petr 2015-09-18 14:59 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me. >> > > please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is > requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0. > this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not > used. > > > > >> >> >> Petr >> >> 2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I tried >>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/... >>>> but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it. >>>> >>>> However, openstack-kilo is ok. >>>> >>> >>> Just another question, is it ok if I add a >>> >>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ >>> instead? >>> it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm >>> <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/open... >>> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there. >>> >>> This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS >>> Virt SIG oVirt releases. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Petr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >>>>>> > *Hi:* >>>>>> > >>>>>> > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch >>>>>> > from check-custom-el7 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > *06:37:41* unresolved deps: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTI... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP. >>>>>> >>>>>> Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is >>>>>> still >>>>>> rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, can we instead add >>>>>> >>>>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ >>>>>> to the repos available to this job? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 >>>>>> attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dan. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sandro Bonazzola >>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community >>>>> collaboration. >>>>> See how it works at redhat.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sandro Bonazzola >>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community >>> collaboration. >>> See how it works at redhat.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com >