----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
To: "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, "Shu Ming"
<shuming(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 6:44:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] restapi: Storage-Domain creation - Used Luns
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Shu Ming" <shuming(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > To: "Ori Liel" <oliel(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 10:50:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] restapi: Storage-Domain creation -
> > Used
> > Luns
> >
> > SHARED_LUN?
>
> We won't be sharing them, we'll be overwriting them.
>
> Maybe something like overwrite or force ?
I'm fine with either one (force / overwrite) or forceDelete as well
or forceOverride.
yep, the key thing here is that we need to scare the user so it's very clear that this
could be destructive.
>
>
> > On 2012-7-1 16:50, Ori Liel wrote:
> > > We need to enable passing 'used' luns for new storage-domain
> > > creation (used = the lun is part of a VG).
> > > We need a way in rest-api to explicitly approve the use of such
> > > luns.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a suggestion for a good name for such a flag,
> > > a
> > > name that conveys: "use the given luns
> > > even if they are part of a VG?"
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ori.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Engine-devel mailing list
> > > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> > >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shu Ming <shuming(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > IBM China Systems and Technology Laboratory
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>