10:21 a.m.
Hi,
according to oVirt Release Process [1], a week after the n-1 release is out, a release
criteria for the new release should be discussed.
Release criteria will include MUST items and SHOULD items (held in wiki)
MUST items will DELAY the release in any case.
SHOULD items will include less critical flows and new features.
SHOULD items will be handled as "best-effort" by component owners
Component owners (e.g. Node, engine-core, vdsm) must ACK the criteria suggested.
Release criteria discussions shouldn't take more then 2 weeks
Progress on MUST items should be review every month, during the weekly meeting
This means that starting today, we should define release criteria for November 12th.
A couple of email have been already posted about this:
* LINK: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/008533.html
* LINK: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008695.html
as starting point for the discussion.
Release management for 3.6.0 has been created [2]
The key milestones for this release must be scheduled:
Key Milestones
Release criteria discussion start: 2014-10-22
Release criteria ready: 2014-11-12
Feature freeze: 60 Days before release
First Test Day: 45 days before release
Release Candidate: 30 days before release
Release: 6 months after oVirt 3.5.0 release
A tracker bug for 3.6.0 has been created [3] and currently show no blockers.
There are 384 bugs [4] targeted to 3.6.0.
Excluding node and documentation bugs we have 364 bugs [5] targeted to 3.6.0.
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Release_process
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6_Release_Management
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155425
[4] http://goo.gl/zwkF3r
[5] http://goo.gl/ZbUiMc
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
1:02 p.m.
New subject: Reminder: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status - release criteria
Hi,
since I don't see activity on this, just a gentle reminder that we should close
release criteria discussion for 2014-11-12.
Is everybody happy just with what was proposed
here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008695.html
and here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-October/028451.html
?
Il 22/10/2014 09:21, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto:
Hi,
according to oVirt Release Process [1], a week after the n-1 release is out, a release
criteria for the new release should be discussed.
Release criteria will include MUST items and SHOULD items (held in wiki)
MUST items will DELAY the release in any case.
SHOULD items will include less critical flows and new features.
SHOULD items will be handled as "best-effort" by component owners
Component owners (e.g. Node, engine-core, vdsm) must ACK the criteria suggested.
Release criteria discussions shouldn't take more then 2 weeks
Progress on MUST items should be review every month, during the weekly meeting
This means that starting today, we should define release criteria for November 12th.
A couple of email have been already posted about this:
* LINK: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/008533.html
* LINK: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008695.html
as starting point for the discussion.
Release management for 3.6.0 has been created [2]
The key milestones for this release must be scheduled:
Key Milestones
Release criteria discussion start: 2014-10-22
Release criteria ready: 2014-11-12
Feature freeze: 60 Days before release
First Test Day: 45 days before release
Release Candidate: 30 days before release
Release: 6 months after oVirt 3.5.0 release
A tracker bug for 3.6.0 has been created [3] and currently show no blockers.
There are 384 bugs [4] targeted to 3.6.0.
Excluding node and documentation bugs we have 364 bugs [5] targeted to 3.6.0.
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Release_process
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6_Release_Management
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155425
[4] http://goo.gl/zwkF3r
[5] http://goo.gl/ZbUiMc
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
1:17 p.m.
New subject: Reminder: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status - release criteria
i didn't see any date for stable branch creation, or it's called by a different
name?
also, worth maybe doing an internal discussion on ovirt vs rhev 3.6 release, in terms of
milestones, qe verification on upstream, etc...
e.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
To: devel(a)ovirt.org
Cc: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>, "Barak Azulay"
<bazulay(a)redhat.com>, "Yaniv Dary" <ydary(a)redhat.com>,
"Einav Cohen" <ecohen(a)redhat.com>, "Dan Kenigsberg"
<danken(a)redhat.com>, "Fabian Deutsch" <fabiand(a)redhat.com>,
"Yaniv Bronheim" <ybronhei(a)redhat.com>, "Martin Sivak"
<msivak(a)redhat.com>, "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek(a)redhat.com>,
"Adam Litke" <alitke(a)redhat.com>, "Itamar Heim"
<iheim(a)redhat.com>, "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>,
"Eyal
Edri" <eedri(a)redhat.com>, "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"Oved Ourfalli" <ovedo(a)redhat.com>, "Lior Vernia"
<lvernia(a)redhat.com>, "Allon Mureinik" <amureini(a)redhat.com>,
"Michal Skrivanek" <mskrivan(a)redhat.com>, "Gil Klein"
<gklein(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:02:00 PM
Subject: Reminder: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status - release
criteria
Hi,
since I don't see activity on this, just a gentle reminder that we should
close release criteria discussion for 2014-11-12.
Is everybody happy just with what was proposed
here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008695.html
and here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-October/028451.html
?
Il 22/10/2014 09:21, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto:
> Hi,
> according to oVirt Release Process [1], a week after the n-1 release is
> out, a release criteria for the new release should be discussed.
>
> Release criteria will include MUST items and SHOULD items (held in wiki)
> MUST items will DELAY the release in any case.
> SHOULD items will include less critical flows and new features.
> SHOULD items will be handled as "best-effort" by component owners
> Component owners (e.g. Node, engine-core, vdsm) must ACK the criteria
> suggested.
> Release criteria discussions shouldn't take more then 2 weeks
> Progress on MUST items should be review every month, during the weekly
> meeting
>
> This means that starting today, we should define release criteria for
> November 12th.
> A couple of email have been already posted about this:
>
> * LINK: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/008533.html
> * LINK: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008695.html
>
> as starting point for the discussion.
>
> Release management for 3.6.0 has been created [2]
> The key milestones for this release must be scheduled:
>
> Key Milestones
> Release criteria discussion start: 2014-10-22
> Release criteria ready: 2014-11-12
> Feature freeze: 60 Days before release
> First Test Day: 45 days before release
> Release Candidate: 30 days before release
> Release: 6 months after oVirt 3.5.0 release
>
> A tracker bug for 3.6.0 has been created [3] and currently show no
> blockers.
>
> There are 384 bugs [4] targeted to 3.6.0.
> Excluding node and documentation bugs we have 364 bugs [5] targeted to
> 3.6.0.
>
> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Release_process
> [2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6_Release_Management
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155425
> [4] http://goo.gl/zwkF3r
> [5] http://goo.gl/ZbUiMc
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
1:47 p.m.
New subject: Reminder: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status - release criteria
On 28/10/14 11:17, Eyal Edri wrote:
i didn't see any date for stable branch creation, or it's
called by a different name?
also, worth maybe doing an internal discussion on ovirt vs rhev 3.6 release, in terms of
milestones, qe verification on upstream, etc...
imho you are mixing up release criteria and release schedule.
criteria are not time based.
notice that release criteria inherit that there must be a testcase and
a person / automatism to test each criteria before the release.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
3483
days inactive
3489
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Eyal Edri -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Sven Kieske