On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:36 PM Viktor Mihajlovski <
mihajlov(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have issues updating vdsm on my Fedora 27 host (s390x, although I
would think that the arch shouldn't matter).
[mihajlov@s3560022 ~]$ sudo dnf update
...
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository
Size
================================================================================
Upgrading:
ovirt-release-master
noarch 4.2.1-0.0.master.20180108005748.git96e5658.fc27
ovirt-master-snapshot 11 k
vdsm s390x 4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27
ovirt-master-snapshot 79 k
...
(14/15): vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.20.11-18.git92c490 29 kB/s | 16 kB
00:00
(15/15): vdsm-python-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc 363 kB/s | 1.2 MB
00:03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 454 kB/s | 1.9 MB
00:04
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/__init__.pyc conflicts
between attempted installs of
vdsm-network-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.s390x and
vdsm-common-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.noarch
file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/__init__.pyo conflicts
between attempted installs of
vdsm-network-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.s390x and
vdsm-common-4.20.11-18.git92c490ca8.fc27.noarch
I *think* this is caused by packaging __init__.py* with both
vdsm-network and vdsm-common. The patch
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/86062/ should help to get around that.
I think you are right.
It will not be possible to install vdsm-network without the __init__.py
file without vdsm, but we don't have such use case yet.
BTW: The vdsm-network package was transiently built as noarch before
it
was replaced by an arch-specific RPM. Since the noarch version has
vanished from the repositories in the meantime, that part of the patch
may be obsolete.
I think we can ignore this package, it was never released, and it
was never correct anyway.
Nir
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards
Viktor Mihajlovski
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel