6:15 p.m.
--=_7d9c71d1-271b-4875-aea3-66898edcc4c8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The following meeting has been modified:
Subject: network - UI Sync meeting
Organizer: "Roy Golan" <rgolan(a)redhat.com>
Time: Monday, February 27, 2012, 4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM GMT +02:00 Jerusalem [MODIFIED]
Invitees: mkenneth(a)redhat.com; sgrinber(a)redhat.com; lpeer(a)redhat.com; dfediuck(a)redhat.com;
drankevi(a)redhat.com; ecohen(a)redhat.com; iheim(a)redhat.com; ovedo(a)redhat.com;
acathrow(a)redhat.com; engine-devel(a)ovirt.org; kroberts(a)redhat.com ...
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Follow-up meeting on setup networks UI.
issues to follow:
1. can VDSM attach many non-vlan and many vlan networks to a single nic? (Dan - please
reply if its doable)
2. if yes is the UI breakdown of vlan/non-vlan is probably not necessary?
open issues:
1.should we use "VmNetwork"? (or "allow/able to run VMs" you name it)
would it be a DC or a Cluster property?
2.should we implicitly set bridge/bridgeless when attaching a network with setupnetworks?
3.nickless networks - was that planned for this version? VDSM support it already but we
are missing the UI and Backend for it.
Bridge ID: 1814335863
https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/listNumbe...
--=_7d9c71d1-271b-4875-aea3-66898edcc4c8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html><body><h3>The following meeting has been modified:</h3>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th align=left>Subject:</th><td>network - UI Sync meeting
</td></tr>
<tr><th align=left>Organizer:</th><td>"Roy Golan"
&lt;rgolan(a)redhat.com&gt; </td></tr>
</table>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th align=left>Time:</th><td>Monday, February 27, 2012,
4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM GMT +02:00 Jerusalem [MODIFIED]
</td></tr></table>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th align=left>Invitees:</th><td>mkenneth@redhat.com;
sgrinber(a)redhat.com; lpeer(a)redhat.com; dfediuck(a)redhat.com; drankevi(a)redhat.com;
ecohen(a)redhat.com; iheim(a)redhat.com; ovedo(a)redhat.com; acathrow(a)redhat.com;
engine-devel(a)ovirt.org; kroberts(a)redhat.com ... </td></tr>
</table>
<div>*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*</div><br><br>Follow-up meeting on setup
networks UI. <br>issues to follow: <br>1. can VDSM attach many non-vlan and
many vlan networks to a single nic? (Dan - please reply if its doable)<br>2. if yes
is the UI breakdown of vlan/non-vlan is probably not necessary?
<br><br><br>open issues:<br>1.should we use "VmNetwork"?
(or "allow/able to run VMs" you name it) would it be a DC or a Cluster
property?<br>2.should we implicitly set bridge/bridgeless when attaching a network
with setupnetworks?<br>3.nickless networks - was that planned for this version? VDSM
support it already but we are missing the UI and Backend for
it.<br><br><br>Bridge ID: 1814335863
<br><br>https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewN...
</body></html>
--=_7d9c71d1-271b-4875-aea3-66898edcc4c8
Content-Type: text/calendar; charset=utf-8; method=REQUEST; name=meeting.ics
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Jerusalem
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:19710101T020000
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=9;BYDAY=2SU
TZNAME:IST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:19710101T020000
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1FR
TZNAME:IDT
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:e6d6ce3a-e7f1-492b-9c52-65365ce2e235
SUMMARY:network - UI Sync meeting
ATTENDEE;CN=Miki Kenneth;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRU
E:mailto:mkenneth@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Simon Grinberg;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=T
RUE:mailto:sgrinber@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Livnat Peer;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE
:mailto:lpeer@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Doron Fediuck;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TR
UE:mailto:dfediuck@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Danny Rankevich;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
TRUE:mailto:drankevi@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Einav Cohen;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE
:mailto:ecohen@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Itamar Heim;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE
:mailto:iheim@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Oved Ourfalli;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TR
UE:mailto:ovedo@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=Andrew Cathrow;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=T
RUE:mailto:acathrow@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=engine-devel;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRU
E:mailto:engine-devel@ovirt.org
ATTENDEE;CN=Keith Robertson;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
TRUE:mailto:kroberts@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;CN=William Henry;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TR
UE:mailto:whenry@redhat.com
ORGANIZER;CN=Roy Golan:mailto:rgolan@redhat.com
DTSTART;TZID="Asia/Jerusalem":20120227T160000
DTEND;TZID="Asia/Jerusalem":20120227T170000
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CLASS:PUBLIC
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
TRANSP:OPAQUE
LAST-MODIFIED:20120222T001540Z
DTSTAMP:20120222T001540Z
SEQUENCE:1
DESCRIPTION:The following meeting has been modified:\n\nSubject: network - U
I Sync meeting \nOrganizer: "Roy Golan" <rgolan(a)redhat.com> \n\nTime:
Monday
\, February 27\, 2012\, 4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM GMT +02:00 Jerusalem [MODIFI
ED]\n \nInvitees: mkenneth(a)redhat.com\; sgrinber(a)redhat.com\; lpeer(a)redhat.c
om\; dfediuck(a)redhat.com\; drankevi(a)redhat.com\; ecohen(a)redhat.com\; iheim@r
edhat.com\; ovedo(a)redhat.com\; acathrow(a)redhat.com\; engine-devel(a)ovirt.org\
; kroberts(a)redhat.com ... \n\n\n*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*\n\n\nFollow-up meeting o
n setup networks UI. \nissues to follow: \n1. can VDSM attach many non-vlan
and many vlan networks to a single nic? (Dan - please reply if its doable)\n
2. if yes is the UI breakdown of vlan/non-vlan is probably not necessary? \n
\n\nopen issues:\n1.should we use "VmNetwork"? (or "allow/able to run
VMs" y
ou name it) would it be a DC or a Cluster property?\n2.should we implicitly
set bridge/bridgeless when attaching a network with setupnetworks?\n3.nickle
ss networks - was that planned for this version? VDSM support it already but
we are missing the UI and Backend for it.\n\n\nBridge ID: 1814335863 \n\nht
tps://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/listNumbersByC
ode.do?confCode=1814335863
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><body><h3>The following meeting has
been
modified:</h3>\n\n<p>\n<table border='0'>\n<tr><th
align=left>Subject:</th><
td>network - UI Sync meeting </td></tr>\n<tr><th
align=left>Organizer:</th><
td>"Roy Golan" &lt\;rgolan(a)redhat.com&gt\;
</td></tr>\n</table>\n<p>\n<table
border='0'>\n<tr><th
align=left>Time:</th><td>Monday\, February 27\, 2012\,
4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM GMT +02:00 Jerusalem [MODIFIED]\n
</td></tr></table
\n<p>\n<table border='0'>\n<tr><th
align=left>Invitees:</th><td>mkenneth@re
dhat.com\;
sgrinber(a)redhat.com\; lpeer(a)redhat.com\; dfediuck(a)redhat.com\; dr
ankevi(a)redhat.com\; ecohen(a)redhat.com\; iheim(a)redhat.com\; ovedo(a)redhat.com\
; acathrow(a)redhat.com\; engine-devel(a)ovirt.org\; kroberts(a)redhat.com ... </t
d></tr>\n</table>\n<div>*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*</div><br><br>Follow-up
meeting o
n setup networks UI. <br>issues to follow: <br>1. can VDSM attach many non-v
lan and many vlan networks to a single nic? (Dan - please reply if its doabl
e)<br>2. if yes is the UI breakdown of vlan/non-vlan is probably not necessa
ry? <br><br><br>open issues:<br>1.should we use
"VmNetwork"? (or "allow/able
to run VMs" you name it) would it be a DC or a Cluster property?<br>2.shoul
d we implicitly set bridge/bridgeless when attaching a network with setupnet
works?<br>3.nickless networks - was that planned for this version? VDSM supp
ort it already but we are missing the UI and Backend for
it.<br><br><br>Brid
ge ID: 1814335863 <br><br>https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/schedulin
g/viewNumbers/listNumbersByCode.do?confCode=1814335863 </body></html>
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT5M
DESCRIPTION:Reminder
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
--=_7d9c71d1-271b-4875-aea3-66898edcc4c8--
4:56 a.m.
Follow-up meeting on setup networks UI.
issues to follow:
1. can VDSM attach many non-vlan and many vlan networks to a single
nic? (Dan - please reply if its doable)
Yes and no
Easy to do:
One non-Vlan + many vlan tagged
If all the non-Vlan are also bridles then yes:
Either using iprout or alias IP
http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_and_Aliased_Interfaces.html
Alias IP can't be enslaved to a bridge thus if deciding to use alias IP then
can also do:
1 Non VLAN tagged + many tagged to many bridge-less non-tagged
You probably can also create many iprout muti IP on a single bridge but not sure about the
benefit of this - and still need verification.
2. if yes is the UI breakdown of vlan/non-vlan is probably not
necessary?
Like you can see above more then necessary, may even need a third category :(
open issues:
1.should we use "VmNetwork"? (or "allow/able to run VMs" you name
it)
would it be a DC or a Cluster property?
I tend to say yes. Cluster level.
PS. Network may have few attributes.
Example:
Management + VMs on one network Storage on the other
Display + VMs + mamagement + storage (Small setup, with single network, Local storage DC)
etc..
2.should we implicitly set bridge/bridgeless when attaching a
network
with setupnetworks?
Depending on the VM-networks tag if we have it.
Best way is to be add by vdsm as needed (When creating the first VM the uses it) but this
raises some flows that not sure you want to have for 3.1 time frame
3.nickless networks - was that planned for this version? VDSM
support
it already but we are missing the UI and Backend for it.
4862
days inactive
4862
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Roy Golan -
Simon Grinberg