1:02 p.m.
Hello All,
Thanks to Martin Perina efforts[1] the ovirt-engine logging was cleaned up significantly
throughout the engine.
1. Logging Facade is slf4j.
2. Logging backend is jboss logging at jboss and java.util.logging at standalone.
3. No more commons-logging, log4j, combinations nor proprietary loggers.
The org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.LogFactory and org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.Log are
depreciated now, the correlation id is managed using logging MDC, so no need to use
wrapper, and correlation has much wider effect, as also 3rd parties log records are
attached with correlation id.
We will start to push changes to remove the usage of these classes in favor of plain slf4j
loggers.
Quick lineup...
1. Usage:
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
class x {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(x.class);
}
2. slf4j logger javadoc is here[2].
3. Crash course:
// simple string
log.info("string");
// string with exception and stack trace
log.info("string", exception);
// string with vars, logger will call argN.toString() for each {}.
log.info("string {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);
4. *NOTICE* Major difference than what we had:
Exception arguments are not "magically" detected.
// previous (utils Log): "exception" magically detected.
log.infoFormat("string {0}", arg1, exception);
// new (slf4j):
log.info("string {}", arg1);
log.info("Exception", exception);
// better new (slf4j):
log.info("string {}", arg1);
log.debug("Exception", exception);
Please do not hesitate to raise any related issue you may find.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109871
[2] http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html
5:14 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
To: devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:02:52 PM
Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
Hello All,
Thanks to Martin Perina efforts[1] the ovirt-engine logging was cleaned up
significantly throughout the engine.
1. Logging Facade is slf4j.
2. Logging backend is jboss logging at jboss and java.util.logging at
standalone.
3. No more commons-logging, log4j, combinations nor proprietary loggers.
Nice work. I was about to write "I guess the next step will be clearing the
ThreadLocalParametersContainer" - but noticed it was already removed.
The org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.LogFactory and
org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.Log are depreciated now, the correlation id
is managed using logging MDC, so no need to use wrapper, and correlation has
much wider effect, as also 3rd parties log records are attached with
correlation id.
Would you consider extending the declaration of @Depracated for those classes
with more information for the sake of those who might miss this email and should
know what is the proper replacement for the deprecated logging method ?
We will start to push changes to remove the usage of these classes in favor
of plain slf4j loggers.
Quick lineup...
1. Usage:
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
class x {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(x.class);
}
2. slf4j logger javadoc is here[2].
3. Crash course:
// simple string
log.info("string");
// string with exception and stack trace
log.info("string", exception);
// string with vars, logger will call argN.toString() for each {}.
log.info("string {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);
4. *NOTICE* Major difference than what we had:
Exception arguments are not "magically" detected.
// previous (utils Log): "exception" magically detected.
log.infoFormat("string {0}", arg1, exception);
// new (slf4j):
log.info("string {}", arg1);
log.info("Exception", exception);
// better new (slf4j):
log.info("string {}", arg1);
log.debug("Exception", exception);
Please do not hesitate to raise any related issue you may find.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109871
[2] http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
5:22 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 1:14:51 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> To: devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:02:52 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>
> Hello All,
>
> Thanks to Martin Perina efforts[1] the ovirt-engine logging was cleaned up
> significantly throughout the engine.
>
> 1. Logging Facade is slf4j.
> 2. Logging backend is jboss logging at jboss and java.util.logging at
> standalone.
> 3. No more commons-logging, log4j, combinations nor proprietary loggers.
>
Nice work. I was about to write "I guess the next step will be clearing the
ThreadLocalParametersContainer" - but noticed it was already removed.
> The org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.LogFactory and
> org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.Log are depreciated now, the correlation id
> is managed using logging MDC, so no need to use wrapper, and correlation
> has
> much wider effect, as also 3rd parties log records are attached with
> correlation id.
Would you consider extending the declaration of @Depracated for those classes
with more information for the sake of those who might miss this email and
should
know what is the proper replacement for the deprecated logging method ?
as I wrote we will remove this classes soon using mass changes.
in few days there will be no reference for these.
>
> We will start to push changes to remove the usage of these classes in favor
> of plain slf4j loggers.
>
> Quick lineup...
>
> 1. Usage:
> import org.slf4j.Logger;
> import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
> class x {
> private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(x.class);
> }
>
> 2. slf4j logger javadoc is here[2].
>
> 3. Crash course:
>
> // simple string
> log.info("string");
>
> // string with exception and stack trace
> log.info("string", exception);
>
> // string with vars, logger will call argN.toString() for each {}.
> log.info("string {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);
>
> 4. *NOTICE* Major difference than what we had:
>
> Exception arguments are not "magically" detected.
>
> // previous (utils Log): "exception" magically detected.
> log.infoFormat("string {0}", arg1, exception);
>
> // new (slf4j):
> log.info("string {}", arg1);
> log.info("Exception", exception);
>
> // better new (slf4j):
> log.info("string {}", arg1);
> log.debug("Exception", exception);
>
> Please do not hesitate to raise any related issue you may find.
>
> Regards,
> Alon Bar-Lev.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109871
> [2] http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
5:40 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:22:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 1:14:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > To: devel(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:02:52 PM
> > Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Thanks to Martin Perina efforts[1] the ovirt-engine logging was cleaned
> > up
> > significantly throughout the engine.
> >
> > 1. Logging Facade is slf4j.
> > 2. Logging backend is jboss logging at jboss and java.util.logging at
> > standalone.
> > 3. No more commons-logging, log4j, combinations nor proprietary loggers.
> >
>
> Nice work. I was about to write "I guess the next step will be clearing the
> ThreadLocalParametersContainer" - but noticed it was already removed.
>
> > The org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.LogFactory and
> > org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.Log are depreciated now, the correlation
> > id
> > is managed using logging MDC, so no need to use wrapper, and correlation
> > has
> > much wider effect, as also 3rd parties log records are attached with
> > correlation id.
>
> Would you consider extending the declaration of @Depracated for those
> classes
> with more information for the sake of those who might miss this email and
> should
> know what is the proper replacement for the deprecated logging method ?
as I wrote we will remove this classes soon using mass changes.
in few days there will be no reference for these.
Yes, I'm currently preparing patches for this, so hopefully within week or two
those classes will be removed from project
> >
> > We will start to push changes to remove the usage of these classes in
> > favor
> > of plain slf4j loggers.
> >
> > Quick lineup...
> >
> > 1. Usage:
> > import org.slf4j.Logger;
> > import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
> > class x {
> > private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(x.class);
> > }
> >
> > 2. slf4j logger javadoc is here[2].
> >
> > 3. Crash course:
> >
> > // simple string
> > log.info("string");
> >
> > // string with exception and stack trace
> > log.info("string", exception);
> >
> > // string with vars, logger will call argN.toString() for each {}.
> > log.info("string {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);
> >
> > 4. *NOTICE* Major difference than what we had:
> >
> > Exception arguments are not "magically" detected.
> >
> > // previous (utils Log): "exception" magically detected.
> > log.infoFormat("string {0}", arg1, exception);
> >
> > // new (slf4j):
> > log.info("string {}", arg1);
> > log.info("Exception", exception);
> >
> > // better new (slf4j):
> > log.info("string {}", arg1);
> > log.debug("Exception", exception);
> >
> > Please do not hesitate to raise any related issue you may find.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alon Bar-Lev.
> >
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109871
> > [2] http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
6:10 a.m.
On 10/20/2014 01:40 PM, Martin Perina wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:22:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 1:14:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: devel(a)ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:02:52 PM
>>> Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Martin Perina efforts[1] the ovirt-engine logging was cleaned
>>> up
>>> significantly throughout the engine.
>>>
>>> 1. Logging Facade is slf4j.
>>> 2. Logging backend is jboss logging at jboss and java.util.logging at
>>> standalone.
>>> 3. No more commons-logging, log4j, combinations nor proprietary loggers.
>>>
>> Nice work. I was about to write "I guess the next step will be clearing the
>> ThreadLocalParametersContainer" - but noticed it was already removed.
>>
>>> The org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.LogFactory and
>>> org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.Log are depreciated now, the correlation
>>> id
>>> is managed using logging MDC, so no need to use wrapper, and correlation
>>> has
>>> much wider effect, as also 3rd parties log records are attached with
>>> correlation id.
>> Would you consider extending the declaration of @Depracated for those
>> classes
>> with more information for the sake of those who might miss this email and
>> should
>> know what is the proper replacement for the deprecated logging method ?
> as I wrote we will remove this classes soon using mass changes.
> in few days there will be no reference for these.
Yes, I'm currently preparing patches for this, so hopefully within week or two
those classes will be removed from project
+1 nice work
>>> We will start to push changes to remove the usage of
these classes in
>>> favor
>>> of plain slf4j loggers.
>>>
>>> Quick lineup...
>>>
>>> 1. Usage:
>>> import org.slf4j.Logger;
>>> import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
>>> class x {
>>> private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(x.class);
>>> }
>>>
>>> 2. slf4j logger javadoc is here[2].
>>>
>>> 3. Crash course:
>>>
>>> // simple string
>>> log.info("string");
>>>
>>> // string with exception and stack trace
>>> log.info("string", exception);
>>>
>>> // string with vars, logger will call argN.toString() for each {}.
>>> log.info("string {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);
>>>
>>> 4. *NOTICE* Major difference than what we had:
>>>
>>> Exception arguments are not "magically" detected.
>>>
>>> // previous (utils Log): "exception" magically detected.
>>> log.infoFormat("string {0}", arg1, exception);
>>>
>>> // new (slf4j):
>>> log.info("string {}", arg1);
>>> log.info("Exception", exception);
>>>
>>> // better new (slf4j):
>>> log.info("string {}", arg1);
>>> log.debug("Exception", exception);
>>>
>>> Please do not hesitate to raise any related issue you may find.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alon Bar-Lev.
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109871
>>> [2] http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
3:07 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
On 10/20/2014 01:40 PM, Martin Perina wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:22:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 1:14:51 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:02:52 PM
>>>> Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
>>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Martin Perina efforts[1] the ovirt-engine logging was cleaned
>>>> up
>>>> significantly throughout the engine.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Logging Facade is slf4j.
>>>> 2. Logging backend is jboss logging at jboss and java.util.logging at
>>>> standalone.
>>>> 3. No more commons-logging, log4j, combinations nor proprietary
loggers.
>>>>
>>> Nice work. I was about to write "I guess the next step will be
clearing
>>> the
>>> ThreadLocalParametersContainer" - but noticed it was already removed.
>>>
>>>> The org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.LogFactory and
>>>> org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.Log are depreciated now, the
correlation
>>>> id
>>>> is managed using logging MDC, so no need to use wrapper, and
correlation
>>>> has
>>>> much wider effect, as also 3rd parties log records are attached with
>>>> correlation id.
>>> Would you consider extending the declaration of @Depracated for those
>>> classes
>>> with more information for the sake of those who might miss this email and
>>> should
>>> know what is the proper replacement for the deprecated logging method ?
>> as I wrote we will remove this classes soon using mass changes.
>> in few days there will be no reference for these.
> Yes, I'm currently preparing patches for this, so hopefully within week or
> two
> those classes will be removed from project
+1 nice work
+1 noticeable improvement - less time to figure out how to do logging different
for each component.
>>>> We will start to push changes to remove the usage of
these classes in
>>>> favor
>>>> of plain slf4j loggers.
>>>>
>>>> Quick lineup...
>>>>
>>>> 1. Usage:
>>>> import org.slf4j.Logger;
>>>> import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
>>>> class x {
>>>> private static final Logger log =
LoggerFactory.getLogger(x.class);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> 2. slf4j logger javadoc is here[2].
>>>>
>>>> 3. Crash course:
>>>>
>>>> // simple string
>>>> log.info("string");
>>>>
>>>> // string with exception and stack trace
>>>> log.info("string", exception);
>>>>
>>>> // string with vars, logger will call argN.toString() for each {}.
>>>> log.info("string {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);
>>>>
>>>> 4. *NOTICE* Major difference than what we had:
>>>>
>>>> Exception arguments are not "magically" detected.
>>>>
>>>> // previous (utils Log): "exception" magically detected.
>>>> log.infoFormat("string {0}", arg1, exception);
>>>>
>>>> // new (slf4j):
>>>> log.info("string {}", arg1);
>>>> log.info("Exception", exception);
>>>>
>>>> // better new (slf4j):
>>>> log.info("string {}", arg1);
>>>> log.debug("Exception", exception);
>>>>
>>>> Please do not hesitate to raise any related issue you may find.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alon Bar-Lev.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109871
>>>> [2] http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
6:22 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mooli Tayer" <mtayer(a)redhat.com>
To: "Roy Golan" <rgolan(a)redhat.com>
Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:07:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
----- Original Message -----
> On 10/20/2014 01:40 PM, Martin Perina wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> >> To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
> >> Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:22:25 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
Kudos !
Another improvement is the usage of {} and not of {<SOME_NUMBER}} - which is prone to
bugs (copy paste, removal of parameter from the formatting, etc..)
Well done!
Yair
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
> >>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> >>> Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 1:14:51 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> >>>> To: devel(a)ovirt.org
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:02:52 PM
> >>>> Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ATN] [ovirt-engine] engine master logging
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello All,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks to Martin Perina efforts[1] the ovirt-engine logging was
> >>>> cleaned
> >>>> up
> >>>> significantly throughout the engine.
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Logging Facade is slf4j.
> >>>> 2. Logging backend is jboss logging at jboss and java.util.logging
at
> >>>> standalone.
> >>>> 3. No more commons-logging, log4j, combinations nor proprietary
> >>>> loggers.
> >>>>
> >>> Nice work. I was about to write "I guess the next step will be
clearing
> >>> the
> >>> ThreadLocalParametersContainer" - but noticed it was already
removed.
> >>>
> >>>> The org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.LogFactory and
> >>>> org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.log.Log are depreciated now, the
> >>>> correlation
> >>>> id
> >>>> is managed using logging MDC, so no need to use wrapper, and
> >>>> correlation
> >>>> has
> >>>> much wider effect, as also 3rd parties log records are attached
with
> >>>> correlation id.
> >>> Would you consider extending the declaration of @Depracated for those
> >>> classes
> >>> with more information for the sake of those who might miss this email
> >>> and
> >>> should
> >>> know what is the proper replacement for the deprecated logging method
?
> >> as I wrote we will remove this classes soon using mass changes.
> >> in few days there will be no reference for these.
> > Yes, I'm currently preparing patches for this, so hopefully within week
> > or
> > two
> > those classes will be removed from project
> +1 nice work
+1 noticeable improvement - less time to figure out how to do logging
different
for each component.
> >>>> We will start to push changes to remove the usage of these classes
in
> >>>> favor
> >>>> of plain slf4j loggers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Quick lineup...
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Usage:
> >>>> import org.slf4j.Logger;
> >>>> import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
> >>>> class x {
> >>>> private static final Logger log =
> >>>> LoggerFactory.getLogger(x.class);
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. slf4j logger javadoc is here[2].
> >>>>
> >>>> 3. Crash course:
> >>>>
> >>>> // simple string
> >>>> log.info("string");
> >>>>
> >>>> // string with exception and stack trace
> >>>> log.info("string", exception);
> >>>>
> >>>> // string with vars, logger will call argN.toString() for each {}.
> >>>> log.info("string {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);
> >>>>
> >>>> 4. *NOTICE* Major difference than what we had:
> >>>>
> >>>> Exception arguments are not "magically" detected.
> >>>>
> >>>> // previous (utils Log): "exception" magically detected.
> >>>> log.infoFormat("string {0}", arg1, exception);
> >>>>
> >>>> // new (slf4j):
> >>>> log.info("string {}", arg1);
> >>>> log.info("Exception", exception);
> >>>>
> >>>> // better new (slf4j):
> >>>> log.info("string {}", arg1);
> >>>> log.debug("Exception", exception);
> >>>>
> >>>> Please do not hesitate to raise any related issue you may find.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Alon Bar-Lev.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109871
> >>>> [2] http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Devel mailing list
> >>>> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Devel mailing list
> >> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
3481
days inactive
3484
days old
6 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Alon Bar-Lev -
Martin Perina -
Mooli Tayer -
Moti Asayag -
Roy Golan -
Yair Zaslavsky