On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:11:23AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
On 03/27/2014 10:32 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> I prefer keeping vdsm-devel intact. It's a different programming
> language, with its different set of problems, unrelated profiling
> issues, and somewhat different target audience.
Having vdsm-devel on fedorahosted is a long-standing cause for
confusion. I'd love to see the list moved to ovirt.org
Personally I see no problem with a separate vdsm-devel list, as long as
everyone is also subscribed to devel - the point of devel is to
concentrate project-wide technical discussion and put an end to the
propagation of CCs we see in oVirt. If vdsm-devel is for VDSM-specific
issues, but anything which could impact anyone else in the project can
be discussed *only* on devel, then a separate list would probably be OK.
However, if we start seeing "To: devel; CC: vdsm-devel" then we're just
perpetuating a problem (that we don't know where to talk to each other
about development topics).
Yes, I am convinced that it makes sense to phase out vdsm-devel, or at
least try to do so, and mentioned it a couple of days ago
If there's no public resentment for this, I'd mass-subscribe all
vdsm-devel to devel(a)ovirt.org in a week or so.