2:52 p.m.
Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle ore 12:33 Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com> ha
scritto:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:01:51AM +0200, Anssi Johansson wrote:
...
> For reference and inspiration, here are some directories from
> mirror.centos.org, including both up-to-date content and potentially EOL
> content. SIGs should review the list to make sure these directories can
> be copied over to 7.6.1810 when that time comes. Making the decisions
> now would save a bit of time at 7.6.1810 release time.
>
..
> storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
> storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12
The above two can be dropped (also for CentOS 6). This includes the
centos-release-gluster310 and centos-release-gluster-312 packages in
Extras.
Can we keep 3.12? It's still consumed by oVirt 4.2.
Adding oVirt devel team, just in case we'll need urgently to rebase on
newer Gluster on CentOS 7.6 GA or block upgrade to CentOS 7.6 from oVirt
side till we figure out how to handle.
> storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0
> storage/x86_64/gluster-4.1
> storage/x86_64/gluster-5
These three are still maintained.
Thanks,
Niels
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel(a)centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
<https://red.ht/sig>
3:23 p.m.
New subject: [CentOS-devel] SIGs: Possibility to drop EOL content at 7.6.1810 release time
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:52:59PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle ore 12:33 Niels de Vos
<ndevos(a)redhat.com> ha
scritto:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:01:51AM +0200, Anssi Johansson wrote:
> ...
> > For reference and inspiration, here are some directories from
> > mirror.centos.org, including both up-to-date content and potentially EOL
> > content. SIGs should review the list to make sure these directories can
> > be copied over to 7.6.1810 when that time comes. Making the decisions
> > now would save a bit of time at 7.6.1810 release time.
> >
> ..
>
> > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
> > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12
>
> The above two can be dropped (also for CentOS 6). This includes the
> centos-release-gluster310 and centos-release-gluster-312 packages in
> Extras.
>
>
Can we keep 3.12? It's still consumed by oVirt 4.2.
Adding oVirt devel team, just in case we'll need urgently to rebase on
newer Gluster on CentOS 7.6 GA or block upgrade to CentOS 7.6 from oVirt
side till we figure out how to handle.
3.12 does not get any updates anymore... Ideally users do not consume
that version but have moved on to 4.0 or 4.1 already. Gluster 5 is
available and should get announced soon (not sure if that can happen
with the CentOS 7.6 release).
If theere are difficulties with upgrading, don't hesitate to reach out
on gluster-devel(a)gluster.org for assistence.
Niels
6:31 p.m.
New subject: [CentOS-devel] SIGs: Possibility to drop EOL content at 7.6.1810 release time
Hello,
I was wondering if there are any upgrade documents available for upgrading to gluster 4.1
with oVirt 4.2.
Best Olaf
7:31 p.m.
New subject: [CentOS-devel] SIGs: Possibility to drop EOL content at 7.6.1810 release time
Il giorno lun 5 nov 2018 alle ore 16:33 <olaf.buitelaar(a)gmail.com> ha
scritto:
Hello,
I was wondering if there are any upgrade documents available for upgrading
to gluster 4.1 with oVirt 4.2.
Adding Sahina
Best Olaf
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/SAMZSFZUTQT...
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
<https://red.ht/sig>
12:44 a.m.
New subject: [CentOS-devel] SIGs: Possibility to drop EOL content at 7.6.1810 release time
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 03:31:44PM -0000, olaf.buitelaar(a)gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if there are any upgrade documents available for
upgrading to gluster 4.1 with oVirt 4.2.
I think oVirt expects the Gluster/NFS server to be available. This
service has been dropped from Gluster in version 4 and has been replaced
with the more featured NFS-server from the NFS-Ganesha project.
I remember that there have been discussions about replacing the
dependency in oVirt, but I do not know what plan and timeline came out
of it. IIRC it was not a trivial change, but the end-of-life date for
Gluster 3.12 has been known for at least 1.5 years now. The deprecation
of Gluster/NFS has been announced even before that.
My hope is that oVirt can be deployed without NFS-server, and just
consume Gluster FUSE mounts, or the userspace libgfapi interface.
Otherwise it may be needed to configure NFS-Ganesha, and that might be
more difficult (it can do high-availability correctly, as opposed to
Gluster/NFS).
Niels
1:24 p.m.
New subject: [CentOS-devel] SIGs: Possibility to drop EOL content at 7.6.1810 release time
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:23:38PM +0000, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:52:59PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle ore 12:33 Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:01:51AM +0200, Anssi Johansson wrote:
> > ...
> > > For reference and inspiration, here are some directories from
> > > mirror.centos.org, including both up-to-date content and potentially EOL
> > > content. SIGs should review the list to make sure these directories can
> > > be copied over to 7.6.1810 when that time comes. Making the decisions
> > > now would save a bit of time at 7.6.1810 release time.
> > >
> > ..
> >
> > > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
> > > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12
> >
> > The above two can be dropped (also for CentOS 6). This includes the
> > centos-release-gluster310 and centos-release-gluster-312 packages in
> > Extras.
> >
> >
> Can we keep 3.12? It's still consumed by oVirt 4.2.
> Adding oVirt devel team, just in case we'll need urgently to rebase on
> newer Gluster on CentOS 7.6 GA or block upgrade to CentOS 7.6 from oVirt
> side till we figure out how to handle.
3.12 does not get any updates anymore... Ideally users do not consume
that version but have moved on to 4.0 or 4.1 already. Gluster 5 is
available and should get announced soon (not sure if that can happen
with the CentOS 7.6 release).
Is it possible for us to remove the centos-release-gluster312 package
from CentOS Extras, but keep the gluster-3.12 repository available for
you to consume with oVirt 4.2? That would prevent users from installing
an unmaintained version, but you can still download the packages.
We also forcefully disable the unmaintained repositories (as they will
get deleted later), but I can wait with that if it helps. This is done
through
https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-gluster-legacy in
case you're interested.
So, what I need from you, is an estimation of dates of when the
following actions can be done:
1. delete centos-release-gluster312 from CentOS Extras
2. remove the gluster-3.12 repository from the mirrors
3. update centos-release-gluster-legacy with Gluster 3.12 deprecation
Thanks,
Niels
1:52 p.m.
New subject: [CentOS-devel] SIGs: Possibility to drop EOL content at 7.6.1810 release time
Il giorno mar 13 nov 2018 alle ore 11:24 Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com>
ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:23:38PM +0000, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:52:59PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle ore 12:33 Niels de Vos <
ndevos(a)redhat.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:01:51AM +0200, Anssi Johansson wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > For reference and inspiration, here are some directories from
> > > > mirror.centos.org, including both up-to-date content and
potentially EOL
> > > > content. SIGs should review the list to make sure these
directories can
> > > > be copied over to 7.6.1810 when that time comes. Making the
decisions
> > > > now would save a bit of time at 7.6.1810 release time.
> > > >
> > > ..
> > >
> > > > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
> > > > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12
> > >
> > > The above two can be dropped (also for CentOS 6). This includes the
> > > centos-release-gluster310 and centos-release-gluster-312 packages in
> > > Extras.
> > >
> > >
> > Can we keep 3.12? It's still consumed by oVirt 4.2.
> > Adding oVirt devel team, just in case we'll need urgently to rebase on
> > newer Gluster on CentOS 7.6 GA or block upgrade to CentOS 7.6 from
oVirt
> > side till we figure out how to handle.
>
> 3.12 does not get any updates anymore... Ideally users do not consume
> that version but have moved on to 4.0 or 4.1 already. Gluster 5 is
> available and should get announced soon (not sure if that can happen
> with the CentOS 7.6 release).
Is it possible for us to remove the centos-release-gluster312 package
from CentOS Extras, but keep the gluster-3.12 repository available for
you to consume with oVirt 4.2? That would prevent users from installing
an unmaintained version, but you can still download the packages.
We also forcefully disable the unmaintained repositories (as they will
get deleted later), but I can wait with that if it helps. This is done
through
https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-gluster-legacy in
case you're interested.
So, what I need from you, is an estimation of dates of when the
following actions can be done:
1. delete centos-release-gluster312 from CentOS Extras
I think this can be removed, we don't have a direct requirement on that
package
2. remove the gluster-3.12 repository from the mirrors
I started discussion with oVirt development team about switching to a newer
Gluster release, I need to get feedback from them.
3. update centos-release-gluster-legacy with Gluster 3.12
deprecation
I think this can be updated while removing centos-release-gluster312 from
CentOS Extras
Thanks,
Niels
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
<https://red.ht/sig>
2201
days inactive
2212
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Niels de Vos -
olaf.buitelaar＠gmail.com -
Sandro Bonazzola