7:01 a.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090408020509030405010906
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
We have now separated tools repositories which are built independently
from ovirt-engine, for example "ovirt-image-uploader". Our rpms
(ovirt-engine) has a dependency on those tools, using the following option:
<snip>
...
Requires: %{name}-image-uploader
...
<snip>
%{name} is substituted by 'ovirt-engine' during build, creating a
dependency on "*ovirt-engine-image-uploader*". This, in turn, makes a
non-resolved dependency, as the actual package name built for
image-uploader is "*ovirt-image-uploader*".
We can resolve this by either changing the dependency in our rpms or by
changing the tools package names (relevant also for iso-uploader and
log-collector).
Please let me know which way seems preferable for this.
Thanks.
--
Alex Lourie.
--------------090408020509030405010906
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
We have now separated tools repositories which are built
independently from ovirt-engine, for example "ovirt-image-uploader".
Our rpms (ovirt-engine) has a dependency on those tools, using the
following option:<br>
<br>
<snip><br>
...<br>
Requires: %{name}-image-uploader<br>
...<br>
<snip><br>
<br>
%{name} is substituted by 'ovirt-engine' during build, creating a
dependency on "<b>ovirt-engine-image-uploader</b>". This, in
turn,
makes a non-resolved dependency, as the actual package name built
for image-uploader is "<b>ovirt-image-uploader</b>".<br>
<br>
We can resolve this by either changing the dependency in our rpms or
by changing the tools package names (relevant also for iso-uploader
and log-collector).<br>
<br>
Please let me know which way seems preferable for this.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Alex Lourie.</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------090408020509030405010906--
7:35 a.m.
On 05/17/2012 02:01 PM, Alex Lourie wrote:
I like more the new shorter package names. In addition they reflect
better the fact that they are not subpackages of the engine. But take
into account that changing the names means that the upgrade path has to
be managed carefully. The new renamed packages should obsolete the old ones.
I would also suggest to replace the "Requires: %{name}-whatever" that we
currently use with "Requires: %{name}-whatever = %{version}-%{release}".
4708
days inactive
4708
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alex Lourie -
Juan Hernandez