Vdsm: Small version numbering change?
Hi, we have a nice coincidence now that Vdsm 4.40.40 corresponds to ovirt-4.4.4 branch. Would we like to use this opportunity to make Vdsm versions aligned with oVirt 4.4.* versions? We can tag the next master build, which will be no longer part of ovirt-4.4.4 branch, as v4.40.50. Or we could tag it as v4.40.500 to be on the safe side, but both 4.4.3 and 4.4.4 had less than 10 tags on master, so it's probably not needed and there is always v4.40.591-like workaround available. What do you think? Regards, Milan
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:03 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
we have a nice coincidence now that Vdsm 4.40.40 corresponds to ovirt-4.4.4 branch. Would we like to use this opportunity to make Vdsm versions aligned with oVirt 4.4.* versions?
We can tag the next master build, which will be no longer part of ovirt-4.4.4 branch, as v4.40.50. Or we could tag it as v4.40.500 to be on the safe side, but both 4.4.3 and 4.4.4 had less than 10 tags on master, so it's probably not needed and there is always v4.40.591-like workaround available.
What do you think?
Regards, Milan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/Q5UK33GMOOAORX...
Hi, +1 it is easier to connect the oVirt version and vdsm version this way. Thanks, Ales -- Ales Musil Software Engineer - RHV Network Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com> amusil@redhat.com IM: amusil <https://red.ht/sig>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:04 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
we have a nice coincidence now that Vdsm 4.40.40 corresponds to ovirt-4.4.4 branch. Would we like to use this opportunity to make Vdsm versions aligned with oVirt 4.4.* versions?
We can tag the next master build, which will be no longer part of ovirt-4.4.4 branch, as v4.40.50. Or we could tag it as v4.40.500 to be on the safe side, but both 4.4.3 and 4.4.4 had less than 10 tags on master, so it's probably not needed and there is always v4.40.591-like workaround available.
Based on older builds 4.40.59 may be an issue, and 4.50.500 is a little too ugly. How about using something similar to engine (currently ovirt-engine-4.4.4.7) v4.40.50.1 v4.40.50.2 ... v4.40.50.12 v4.40.60.1 v4.40.60.2 ...
What do you think?
Regards, Milan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/Q5UK33GMOOAORX...
Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:04 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
we have a nice coincidence now that Vdsm 4.40.40 corresponds to ovirt-4.4.4 branch. Would we like to use this opportunity to make Vdsm versions aligned with oVirt 4.4.* versions?
We can tag the next master build, which will be no longer part of ovirt-4.4.4 branch, as v4.40.50. Or we could tag it as v4.40.500 to be on the safe side, but both 4.4.3 and 4.4.4 had less than 10 tags on master, so it's probably not needed and there is always v4.40.591-like workaround available.
Based on older builds 4.40.59 may be an issue, and 4.50.500 is a little too ugly.
How about using something similar to engine (currently ovirt-engine-4.4.4.7)
v4.40.50.1 v4.40.50.2 ... v4.40.50.12 v4.40.60.1 v4.40.60.2 ...
I think this is a good idea. We have already been using 4-part versioning for stable updates (e.g. v4.40.26.* for 4.4.2 updates) so it shouldn't cause any trouble. With the new scheme, we would simply use 4-part versioning all the time, both on master and stable branches. The suggested versioning change got positive responses and I think Nir's proposal is a further improvement. If nobody objects, we can start using it with the first 4.4.5 build on master.
What do you think?
Regards, Milan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/Q5UK33GMOOAORX...
participants (3)
-
Ales Musil -
Milan Zamazal -
Nir Soffer