6:43 a.m.
Hello,
I recently submitted a change to fix the way we manage namespaces in the
OVF writer:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/4540
The problem is that it doesn't work with the StAX reference
implementation included with Java 7.
With the patched OVF writer I generated the attached OVF file. I would
appreciate if someone can take a quick look at it and tell me if it is
correct. I would also appreciate if you can send me known good OVF files
generated by the engine, to compare them with the ones produced with the
patched OVF writer.
Thanks in advance,
Juan Hernandez
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.
9:58 a.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030402010905010207040707
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Juan,
I wouldn't consider it an exhaustive test by any means, but I have a
simple .ovf file in the Image Uploader GIT repo that I do unit testing
with. You can review the OVF XML file therein if you like.
FWIW, I would recommend you simply export an image from an "unpatched"
oVirt engine and just compare the resulting XML to a patched version.
1: git clone gerrit.ovirt.org:ovirt-image-uploader
2: cd ovirt-image-uploader/src
3: tar -xvf sample.ovf <- This is a portable/exported "image"
- Note: For some reason there seems to be a consensus to append/apply
the .ovf extension to .tgz file image files. It is somewhat confusing,
IMHO.
4: Look at
master/vms/5272b689-cd9f-4532-9b5d-2413eb7b9402/5272b689-cd9f-4532-9b5d-2413eb7b9402.ovf
for an OVF XML file.
Cheers,
Keith
On 05/18/2012 06:43 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
Hello,
I recently submitted a change to fix the way we manage namespaces in
the OVF writer:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/4540
The problem is that it doesn't work with the StAX reference
implementation included with Java 7.
With the patched OVF writer I generated the attached OVF file. I would
appreciate if someone can take a quick look at it and tell me if it is
correct. I would also appreciate if you can send me known good OVF
files generated by the engine, to compare them with the ones produced
with the patched OVF writer.
Thanks in advance,
Juan Hernandez
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
--------------030402010905010207040707
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Juan,<br>
<br>
I wouldn't consider it an exhaustive test by any means, but I have a
simple .ovf file in the Image Uploader GIT repo that I do unit
testing with. You can review the OVF XML file therein if you like.<br>
<br>
FWIW, I would recommend you simply export an image from an
"unpatched" oVirt engine and just compare the resulting XML to a
patched version.<br>
<br>
1: git clone gerrit.ovirt.org:ovirt-image-uploader<br>
2: cd ovirt-image-uploader/src<br>
3: tar -xvf sample.ovf <- This is a portable/exported
"image"<br>
- Note: For some reason there seems to be a consensus to
append/apply the .ovf extension to .tgz file image files. It is
somewhat confusing, IMHO.<br>
4: Look at
master/vms/5272b689-cd9f-4532-9b5d-2413eb7b9402/5272b689-cd9f-4532-9b5d-2413eb7b9402.ovf
for an OVF XML file.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Keith<br>
<br>
<br>
On 05/18/2012 06:43 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4FB627CF.8050805@redhat.com"
type="cite">Hello,
<br>
<br>
I recently submitted a change to fix the way we manage namespaces
in the OVF writer:
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://gerrit.ovirt.org/4540">http://gerrit.ovirt.org/...
<br>
<br>
The problem is that it doesn't work with the StAX reference
implementation included with Java 7.
<br>
<br>
With the patched OVF writer I generated the attached OVF file. I
would appreciate if someone can take a quick look at it and tell
me if it is correct. I would also appreciate if you can send me
known good OVF files generated by the engine, to compare them with
the ones produced with the patched OVF writer.
<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance,
<br>
Juan Hernandez
<br>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Engine-devel@ovirt.org">Engine-devel@ovirt.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel">...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------030402010905010207040707--
1:20 p.m.
On 05/18/2012 03:58 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
Juan,
I wouldn't consider it an exhaustive test by any means, but I have a
simple .ovf file in the Image Uploader GIT repo that I do unit testing
with. You can review the OVF XML file therein if you like.
FWIW, I would recommend you simply export an image from an "unpatched"
oVirt engine and just compare the resulting XML to a patched version.
1: git clone gerrit.ovirt.org:ovirt-image-uploader
2: cd ovirt-image-uploader/src
3: tar -xvf sample.ovf<- This is a portable/exported "image"
- Note: For some reason there seems to be a consensus to append/apply
the .ovf extension to .tgz file image files. It is somewhat confusing,
IMHO.
4: Look at
master/vms/5272b689-cd9f-4532-9b5d-2413eb7b9402/5272b689-cd9f-4532-9b5d-2413eb7b9402.ovf
for an OVF XML file.
Keith, that helped a lot, thanks! After comparing with your example I
updated the patch and now the result almost identical to the example.
The resulting XML that I get now is attached. I appreciate if someone
can take a look.
On 05/18/2012 06:43 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently submitted a change to fix the way we manage namespaces in
> the OVF writer:
>
> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/4540
>
> The problem is that it doesn't work with the StAX reference
> implementation included with Java 7.
>
> With the patched OVF writer I generated the attached OVF file. I would
> appreciate if someone can take a quick look at it and tell me if it is
> correct. I would also appreciate if you can send me known good OVF
> files generated by the engine, to compare them with the ones produced
> with the patched OVF writer.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Juan Hernandez
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.
4372
days inactive
4372
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Juan Hernandez -
Keith Robertson